From: Richard L. <ce...@l-...> - 2007-05-23 21:54:12
|
On Wed, May 23, 2007 10:06 am, Jennifer Stander wrote: >> Remember you get what you pay for. And conversely, you get (the job) >> they >> pay you for. >> >> [OK, I'm done b$^ching) >> >> Walter > > I normally wouldn't reply to this, but I should clarify that yes it is > hourly and that your math is incorrect. On the high end of the pay > range we are offering, the programmer would make close to $70K a year, > which is more than your calculated $1250 a month. Anybody in this group who pays attention also has two former employees (I'm one of them) that they could ask for background info. For me, info.com was a great place to work, for many reasons. The hourly wages offered in Jennifer's post had a pretty wide range, presumably commensurate with experience, so I also thought the math was a bit skewed by taking the "average" of 23 and 33. If you're worth $33/hour == $66k/year (give or take) that was on the table in the original email. Keep in mind this is for a solid 40 hours a week, not some catch-as-catch-can freelance rate, where you may only have 10 billable hours a month. There's a huge difference in scope and scale there, so hourly freelance rates, and hourly full-time rates are apples and oranges. Be that as it may, if you're right for the job, and it appeals, I daresay you can upsell your price some anyway. Three years' experience is not exactly "expert", imho. Maybe some folks became experts in 3 years, but not most. Hell, most PHP scripters don't get past a basic guestbook in their first year :-) :-) :-) -- Some people have a "gift" link here. Know what I want? I want you to buy a CD from some indie artist. http://cdbaby.com/browse/from/lynch Yeah, I get a buck. So? |