From: Neil R. <Nei...@rc...> - 2008-04-28 01:13:51
|
Design precedes implementation . . . At 06:52 PM 4/27/2008, "Jough Dempsey" <jou...@gm...> wrote: >I know what you mean about wanting your links on your site. You >mentioned SQLite in FF3, which may be an option for offline caching, >but you may also want to consider Google Gears, which works in more >browsers and may or may not be more robust (if slightly less "open" >than SQLite). > >- J. > >On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 6:38 PM, Neil Rest <Nei...@rc...> wrote: > > I don't want my data residing on an alien server. They can and do > > vanish; get bought/sold; and unilaterally change their privacy and > > access policies. > > This isn't about "my site". I expect code to be open; data is > > proprietary. (Hey, this list gets a "sourceforge" link appended to > > each email!) > > > > (Data interchange facilities are certainly on the list; we can > > exchange all or part of our respective lists, even retaining origin > > stamps for individual entries.) > > > > > > At 05:45 PM 4/27/2008, "Jough Dempsey" <jou...@gm...> wrote: > > >I like the way Magnolia lets you add bookmarks from a simple bookmarklet: > > > > > >http://ma.gnolia.com/ > > > > > >Delicious is of course the leader in this area, but its interface > > >leaves a bit to be desired: http://del.icio.us > > > > > >http://reddit.com/ and http://digg.com focus on the social > bookmarking aspect. > > > > On 4/21/08, Neil Rest <Nei...@rc...> wrote: > > > > > The last time I looked, there didn't seem to be a good > database for web > > > > > bookmarks. Considering how much weird stuff has a dozen > > > different projects > > > > > going on out there, it seemed an odd gap, so I decided I > > > wanted to do one. > > > > > (I now have almost enough time, energy, and stability to start > > > serious work. > > > > > We'll see.) > > > > > > > > > > The biggest, broadest question is the various lookup approaches to > > > > > implement. The more the better, broadly -- you ought to > be in charge of > > > > > your collection, not vice versa -- but I'm no library > scientist, or even > > > > > retrieval expert. > > > > > > > > > > > > So the question I'm broadcasting is: How would you like > to be able to > > > > > search your own collection of bookmarks? Secondarily, > what good (i.e., > > > > > "user friendly" for some value of user) ways of doing searches > > > do you know > > > > > of, or think ought to go into an ideal bookmarker? Neil -- Nei...@rc... Anyone who isn't confused really doesn't understand the situation. |