Confusion about whether set -o emacs is or is not a bashism
Brought to you by:
markhobley
checkbashisms does not treat set -o emacs
as a bashism. However, I do not see a corresponding entry in the POSIX sh documentation.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/set.html
Should checkbashisms start reporting this as a bashism?
Additionally, ShellCheck notes that
set -o emacs
is a bashism. checkbashisms should follow suit.