Re: [cgiwrap-users] cleaner SCRIPT_NAME from REDIRECT_URL

[san <san...@co...>]

nneul wrote:
> Please check the cvs version to see if it does what you prefer.
> 
> -- Nathan

The cvs version does *exactly* the same as the 3.7 version. 

> 
> On Fri, 2002-09-20 at 06:05, san wrote:
> > For redirect-based setups I made a patch to ciwrap-3.7
> > so to have a cleaner SCRIPT_NAME. 
> > 
> > Right now it is always constructed using apache setted SCRIPT_NAME
> > (tipically /cgi-bin/cgiwrap) and appending to it the username and
> > the script relative path. This brings to a working but unclean url
> > because in cases in which redirection takes place it would be
> > better to have a yet-to-redirect SCRIPT_NAME.
> > 
> > 	OLD WAY: /~user/script.cgi -> /cgi-bin/cgiwrap/user/script.cgi
> > 	PATCHED: /~user/script.cgi -> /~user/script.cgi
> > 
> > This is accomplished by the use of the (NON-STANDARD) REDIRECT_URL
> > variable when set.
> > 
> > The patch can be found here:
> > http://cobalt.rmnet.it/~san/cgiwrap/cgiwrap-3.7-redirecturl.patch
> > 
> > --san;
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> > Welcome to geek heaven.
> > http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> > _______________________________________________
> > cgiwrap-users mailing list
> > cgi...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgiwrap-users
> -- 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nn...@um...
> University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
> Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216