[cgiwrap-users] RE: #!/usr/bin/php

[Neulinger, N. <nn...@um...>]

I just committed a change that results in slightly different behavior.

Examples: (my home dir is /afs/umr.edu/users/nneul, server docroot is
/local/apache-root/htdocs)

/cgi-bin/cgiwrapd/nneul/test/fred
	Input: /local/apache-root/htdocs/nneul/test/fred
	Output: /local/apache-root/htdocs/fred

	i.e. DOCROOT + PATH_INFO

Unfortunately, with ~, I can't handle in a straightforward manner at the
moment, so it makes no change. (Apache already changes P_T to include
user home dir.)

/cgi-bin/cgiwrapd/~nneul/test/fred
	Input: /afs/umr.edu/users/nneul/public_html/test/fred
	Output: /afs/umr.edu/users/nneul/public_html/test/fred

-- Nathan

------------------------------------------------------------
Nathan Neulinger                       EMail:  nn...@um...
University of Missouri - Rolla         Phone: (573) 341-4841
Computing Services                       Fax: (573) 341-4216


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Nolte [mailto:dr...@gm...]=20
> Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 10:38 AM
> To: Neulinger, Nathan
> Cc: cgi...@li...
> Subject: RE: #!/usr/bin/php
>=20
>=20
> Hi,=20
>=20
> > You're saying that the script is physically located at:
> >	/var/chroot/_nossh/k060881/htdocs/test.php
>=20
> no, it is physically located in
> /var/chroot/_nossh/k060881/htdocs/phpmagic.de/test.php
>=20
> (For testing reason, I also placed a test.php in
> /var/chroot/_nossh/k060881/htdocs/test.php - so that I'm able=20
> to access
> it. But I requested
> /var/chroot/_nossh/k060881/htdocs/phpmagic.de/test.php, cgiwrap just
> constructed a wrong path out of it :())
>=20
>=20
> >I'm willing to change what cgiwrap does, so long as someone=20
> can provide
> >me a pointer to a reference that says exactly what PATH_TRANSLATED is
> >supposed to do, assuming that cgiwrap has the necessary=20
> information at
> >the time.
> > It does clearly look like it's bogus from cgiwrap.
> > That one makes it look like it should be DOCUMENT_ROOT +=20
> PATH_INFO. I
> > can do that if those vars are passed. (I believe they are).
>=20
> I think the PATH_INFO will for cgiwrap - cgiwrap itself. So=20
> it wouldn't
> be really useable
>=20
> > Alternatively, I can just leave it alone, and merely strip out the
> > "/user/" part?
>=20
> This will work, aslong the username will never occur as directoryname.
> For me it's fine. And would really help me and should work=20
> for everyone
> else, too.
>=20
> Bye
> daniel
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20