RE: AW: AW: [cgiwrap-users] CGIWrap Error: Script dir not found
Brought to you by:
nneul
From: Neulinger, N. <nn...@um...> - 2002-08-05 19:55:16
|
I have applied most of Piotr's patch with changes... I have not enabled part of it though - which is the part messing with PATH_INFO, cause I'm not quite sure of why that is being done. If you're a php-cgiwrap user, you might check out and build the latest cgiwrap, and let me know if it works ok for you. If you have any info on the PATH_INFO handling, speak up.=20 Also, since I'll likely release this as 3.8, are there any other fixes to PATH_INFO, PATH_TRANSLATED, etc. That should be applied? If someone can describe what is wrong now, and point me at details as to how it should behave, I'll fix for 3.8.=20 -- Nathan ------------------------------------------------------------ Nathan Neulinger EMail: nn...@um... University of Missouri - Rolla Phone: (573) 341-4841 Computing Services Fax: (573) 341-4216 > -----Original Message----- > From: Daniel Lorch [mailto:ml-...@lo...]=20 > Sent: Monday, August 05, 2002 7:43 AM > To: Neulinger, Nathan > Cc: dr...@gm...; cgi...@li... > Subject: Re: AW: AW: [cgiwrap-users] CGIWrap Error: Script=20 > dir not found >=20 >=20 > hi, >=20 > > Seems like two two big ones are: > >=20 > > No need for #!/usr/bin/php > > No need for script to be executable >=20 > Yup. >=20 > > Anything else? >=20 > What troubled me most was how CGIWRAP constructed the=20 > cgiBaseDir. It might > increase security, but it didn't work with our setup: >=20 > /home/<user>/public_html/<subdomain>/ >=20 > That's the main reason I had to patch CGIWRAP myself. Why=20 > isn't PATH_TRANSLATED > used instead? Are there any security concerns? >=20 > -daniel >=20 |