Re: [cgi-prototype-users] Moose implementation of CGI::Prototype

[<me...@st...>]

>>>>> "Terrence" == Terrence Brannon <met...@gm...> writes:

Terrence> Randal wants to maintain prototype-based OOP for a Moose-based version 
Terrence> of CGI::Prototype. I'm wondering if such a Moose class could be as 
Terrence> simple as:


Terrence> package CGI::Prototype::Moose;

Terrence> use Moose;
Terrence> extends 'Class::Prototyped';

Not really.  The prototype stuff of Moose is where you want to start, and it
has a different interface.  If you just pulled in Class::Prototyped, you'd
have a lot of potential conflicts, especially around anonymous classes.

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<me...@st...> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion