|
From: Mike M. <mi...@su...> - 2006-11-28 22:35:04
|
Karsten, I misunderstood your original problem statement, sorry I never run CGDB on a white background, personally. When I tested it with a black background, everything was bold all the time, which is a bug we should fix. However, just now I tested it with a white background on Cygwin. The vertical bar toggles between gray when focused and black when not focused. I'm not sure if this behavior was intended or not. I'm not seeing any blue bars anywhere, though. :) Is there a way you can post a screenshot of what you're seeing? We can try to work out a more intuitive way of indicating focus, too. Thanks for the comments. Thanks, Mike On 11/28/06, Mike Mueller <mi...@su...> wrote: > Karsten's right, I just tested this on cygwin. In 0.5.3, the vertical > line is bold when the source window is focused. In 0.6.3, it's always > bold, whether focused or not. It does seem like the relevant code > hasn't changed, but clearly something broke. I'll take a look. > > Mike > > On 11/28/06, Karsten Sievert <kar...@sy...> wrote: > > Hi, Bob, > > > > thanks for the quick response. > > > > Bob Rossi wrote: > > > Well, the svn version of CGDB has support for macros. That is, > > > it supports the "map" command. It hasn't been released yet > > > because it's not fully tested, and there is no documentation > > > for the commands, and if you do a 'map a a' it will loop > > > forever, and never return. With that in mind, you could try > > > the svn version, and see if you could make some macro's that > > > would suit your needs. Currently it only supports the 'map' > > > and 'unmap' command. However, if you desired support for the > > > 'imap' command, I could code that up without to much effort > > > based on the existing code. Let me know if you are interested > > > in any of this. > > > > Yes, I might be. This is what I'm gonna do: If I manage to > > check out the SVN version (time is the limiting factor here), > > then I'll ask for dos and don'ts and try to come up with > > something useful. > > > > > OK, something isn't correct here. There was no intention of > > > changing CGDB's behavior between .5.3 and .6.3. In fact, when > > > I run .5.3 and .6.3 in a white xterm, both versions show the > > > vertical line as being bold. > > ... > > > If you are happy with the A_BOLD functionality, but this > > > changes the color of your vertical line somehow, we need more info. > > > Have you tested both .5.3 and .6.3 in the same term environment and > > > noticed these differences? > > > > Yes, it was even the same window, I used a different window to > > compile 0.6.3 and restarted cgdb in the first; what was black BG > > first became white BG now. I'm using eXceed xterms which show a > > linux shell, and remote-display that through Cytrix. If I am not > > mistaken, than cgdb sees the Hummingbird eXceed terminal emulation > > in this setup. The separator switches from black to blue if I > > activate the source window, but is not bold. The current line > > number in the middle of the screen when I scroll is also not bold. > > The active line (green arrow), the red breakpoint line numbers, > > and fixed strings and much more in C style syntax highlight are > > bold, though. I can see the statement "return" colored in > > bold blue. There must be subtle difference somewhere... > > > > If you think this is no longer a "users" thread, pls. answer on > > "devel". > > > > > > Thanks for the support! > > -Karsten > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > > _______________________________________________ > > Cgdb-users mailing list > > Cgd...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users > > > |
