Re: [Cgdb-users] cgdb & automake

[Peter K. <pe...@ko...>]

I think that's fine.  If, in the future, you wanted to export a single
library, you could always generate one out of the sublibraries.

One of these days I'm seriouly going to finish up that config stuff.
How do the key bindings work right now?  I'm thinking about adding a
'bind' when I create the config file parser.

Peter

On Fri, Apr 25, 2003 at 08:30:28PM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I re-organized the make system for cgdb/tgdb.
>=20
> The new way creates many libraries instead of only one monolithic libtgdb=
.a
>=20
> This is good because:
> 1. It physically separates the code into directories.
> 2. Makes code easier to find and understand
> 3. It forces units to only rely on lower units
>=20
> Its bad because:
> 1. The user that wants to link to libtgdb has to link to its dependents
>    The current list is already 5 libraries.=20
>    ( -lutil -ladt -lannotate-two -lgdbmi -ltgdb )
> 2. It slows down ./configure;make;make install
>=20
> What does everyone think?

--=20
Peter D. Kovacs <pe...@ko...>