|
From: Bob R. <bob...@co...> - 2007-08-06 13:07:18
|
On Sun, Aug 05, 2007 at 11:50:43PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > On 8/2/07, Bob Rossi <bob...@co...> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 01:52:57PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote: > > > On Mon, 2007-07-30 at 15:53 -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > > > > At a minimum, I at least ask each new developer if it's OK if this is > > > > licensed under the GPL and if it's OK that I license it under a > > > > different open source (http://www.opensource.org/licenses) approved license > > > > in the future if I decide I want to. > > > > > > As long as it's OSS approved, the patches are yours. > > > > Gilboa, where you going to repost the other patches, or do you expect me > > to figure them out from the patch we already applied? I was hoping you > > were going to repost. Either way, no hurry, just wanted to clear that > > up. > > > > Thanks, > > Bob Rossi > > > > Hello Bob, > > I'm not sure I got the question: > First patch cleans up the command code. > Tomorrow (or the day after - I'm been recovering from a massive RAID > upgrade) I'll be posting a second patch that will merge the key-store > and command interface. OK. Sounds good. What exactly will this patch do? I know you are saying 'key-store', I'm not sure what that means. > A couple of days later I plan on releasing a third patch that will add > additional gdb features /commands. (kill/start/etc). > > Is it OK by you? OK, sounds perfect. Thanks, Bob Rossi |
