Re: [Cgdb-devel] cvs or svn

[Steve F. <st...@fo...>]

> I was thinking about upgrading CGDB to svn instead of using cvs. Any
> comments?

Isn't that more of a sidegrade than an upgrade?  There's quite a lot
of interesting work and experimentation going on in the field of
source-code control right now.  Unfortunately that means that there
isn't a consensus about what's best (like there used to be with CVS).=20
Personally, I'm using tla (a.k.a. GNU Arch), but I'm rooting for bzr
(a.k.a. Bazaar NG).  But I'm only using it for my one-man projects, so
I'm really not taking advantage of the things it (and all the other
modern source-code control systems) is best at.  (And by "modern", I
more or less mean "distributed".)  Darcs and monotone are a couple
others I can think of; I'm sure there are more I'm forgetting about or
haven't heard of.  (And then there's svk, an attempt to graft
distributedness onto svn.)