Re: [Cgdb-devel] cgdb 0.4.2 build problem

[Robert L. <rob...@se...>]

On Wed, Jul 14, 2004 at 08:22:41AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote:
> OK, sorry to drag this on, so we think DESTDIR has nothing to do with
> the "progs" directory. Do I have to prefix where CGDB get's installed
> with it? or does that work fine?

right, and the installation otherwise works fine, already uses DESTIDR

> So to sum up, we probably don't care about the "progs" directory
> for binary distributions. So, DESTDIR doesn't matter with the "progs"
> directory, right? So, you suggest using top_bindir. I wonder if
> top_builddir is better, because that is guarenteed to be writable. Also,
> top_builddir will just put the "progs" directory in the build
> directory. However top_bindir will install it into the installation
> directory. Is that correct?
>=20
> If it is, I would prefer to use top_builddir. If this solves the debian
> problem, we can release very soon?

sorry, my fault. top_builddir is the way to go. if you want to you could
send me a pre-release tarball and i can try the debian installation
procedure on it...

cu  robert

--=20
Robert Lemmen                               http://www.semistable.com=20