Re: [Cgdb-devel] ncurses vs curses
Brought to you by:
bobbybrasko,
crouchingturbo
From: Mike M. <mmu...@cs...> - 2003-02-18 03:03:11
|
I agree... we shouldn't give up on curses until it proves to be too difficult to maintain... Even if some features are absent, I don't see a good reason to exclude curses users from using cgdb. Mike On Mon, 17 Feb 2003, Peter Kovacs wrote: :I say we should still try to offer minimal support for curses. Sure :throw in all the bells and whistles if you're using ncurses, but perhaps :at least try to get something usable when using curses? : :- Peter : :On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 07:02:11PM -0500, Bob Rossi wrote: :> Hi guys, :> :> I recieved this bug report today via Email. :> :> The only ( minor ) thing that bothers me is that my xterms have a white :> background by default, while cgdb use a black one, and, halas, do not :> refresh the full screen at start, only parts where it have real text :> to display. Ok, it's just a matter of resizing window a bit to force :> a display refresh, but ... as i said, it's the only bothering thing :> (and nearly the only reason to continue checking for new cgdb versions) :> :> :> :> So, I decided to look into fixing the default color cgdb uses. :> Well it seems that I can't find a way to do it in curses. I can only :> find an extension to ncurses that does the trick. The 2 functions :> use_default_colors and assume_default_colors are ncurses extensions. :> :> So, I already fixed the bug by changing several lines of code in cgdb. :> However, it only works if the user links with ncurses. Not curses. :> So I thought maybe we should just stop supporting curses, Since it :> doesn't by our users much. :> :> What do you guys think? :> :> Bobby : : : : |