cgdb-users Mailing List for the curses debugger
Brought to you by:
bobbybrasko,
crouchingturbo
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(9) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(12) |
Dec
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(8) |
May
(8) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(11) |
Sep
|
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(8) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(7) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(13) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(8) |
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(3) |
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(13) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(2) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
(3) |
2012 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Robert R. <bo...@br...> - 2017-04-20 15:08:58
|
After 5 years of having this email in my inbox, I can finally delete it. :) CGDB v0.7.0 now has the ability to display source and assembly. Thanks! Bob Rossi Than On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Brendan Creane <bc...@ya...> wrote: > Greetings cgdb-users, > > Can anyone suggest a way to display assembly code in the source window? > I'm debugging code without high level source and it would be helpful to > track the $pc. Right now I'm just displaying the assembly around $pc after > each step (display /i3 $pc), but being able to set assembly level > breakpoints and using other features of cgdb would be helpful. > > thanks, Brendan > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the > demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly. > Take a complimentary Learning@Cisco Self-Assessment and learn > about Cisco certifications, training, and career opportunities. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/cisco-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > Cgdb-users mailing list > Cgd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users > > |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2012-05-26 12:05:55
|
On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:48:15PM +0100, David Fernandez wrote: > Hi there, > > I have several "gdb" executables for several target processors: > "arm-eabi-gdb", "arm-elf-gdb", etc. > > When building cgdb, I've tried to "configure --target=arm-eabi" to try > making it use a specific debugger, but not only does it not get > installed with the proper suffix (arm-eabi-cgdb), it also keeps using > the undecorated gdb. Configuring cgdb like that would cross compile cgdb for the arm target. In general, I would expect the name of cgdb to change as you suggested, i'm not sure why that's not happening. However, it is expected that it will continue to use the regular gdb command. Use the cgdb -d option to switch the underlying debugger that cgdb uses. Bob |
From: David F. <dav...@go...> - 2012-05-25 22:48:21
|
Hi there, I have several "gdb" executables for several target processors: "arm-eabi-gdb", "arm-elf-gdb", etc. When building cgdb, I've tried to "configure --target=arm-eabi" to try making it use a specific debugger, but not only does it not get installed with the proper suffix (arm-eabi-cgdb), it also keeps using the undecorated gdb. Is it not supporting other than native gdb? I would say that supporting cross debuggers shouldn't have to be a big deal, but perhaps there is a reason why cgdb doesn't. Could you let me know if that is the case, and otherwise, what would be the right way to get cgdb to use the right cross debugger? Cheers David |
From: aj3423 <aj...@gm...> - 2011-12-15 03:15:09
|
I tried starting cgdb from an cygwin shell, still the same problem. |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2011-12-14 19:05:09
|
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 11:26:15PM +0800, aj3423 wrote: > I'm trying cgdb on win7 32bit +cygwin, and got a problem, here's how to > reproduce it: > 1. open cgdb by double clicking the cgdb.exe I never done this before. I typically start cgdb from within an already started cygwin shell. Does this solve your problem? Bob |
From: aj3423 <aj...@gm...> - 2011-12-14 15:26:21
|
Hi, I'm trying cgdb on win7 32bit +cygwin, and got a problem, here's how to reproduce it: 1. open cgdb by double clicking the cgdb.exe 2. type any undefined command like "abcd", as shown in the picture 3. after gdb echos the error text, the command won't work anymore, the <Enter> key just bringing up new lines, but not executing the command. I tried <ctrl>+ l, still doesn't work is this a bug or I missed something? Thanks. http://i1021.photobucket.com/albums/af333/aj3423/cgdb-1.png[image: cgdb-1.png] |
From: Brendan C. <bc...@ya...> - 2011-10-25 18:54:39
|
Greetings cgdb-users, Can anyone suggest a way to display assembly code in the source window? I'm debugging code without high level source and it would be helpful to track the $pc. Right now I'm just displaying the assembly around $pc after each step (display /i3 $pc), but being able to set assembly level breakpoints and using other features of cgdb would be helpful. thanks, Brendan |
From: Roland H. <Rol...@kl...> - 2011-06-17 12:25:51
|
Ich bin bis 20.06.2011 abwesend. Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "Cgdb-users Digest, Vol 13, Issue 1" gesendet am 17.6.2011 14:04:25. Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während diese Person abwesend ist. |
From: KC <kc...@gm...> - 2011-06-16 17:26:34
|
Hi, First, thanks for all you guys effort ... cgdb is cool !! And it's super cool for vi lover like me :-) Just want to report the Win32 download link is broken: http://cgdb.sourceforge.net/files/cgdb-0.6.5-win32.tar.gz Where can I get Win32 binary ? Do I need cygwin to run win32 cgdb ? Any plan to build cgdb using mingw ? Thanks KC |
From: Roland H. <Rol...@kl...> - 2010-10-11 12:30:41
|
Ich bin bis 25.10.2010 abwesend. Hinweis: Dies ist eine automatische Antwort auf Ihre Nachricht "Cgdb-users Digest, Vol 12, Issue 1" gesendet am 11.10.10 14:04:06. Diese ist die einzige Benachrichtigung, die Sie empfangen werden, während diese Person abwesend ist. |
From: M. H. <mh...@gm...> - 2010-10-11 08:56:52
|
Hi, when I use "set logging on" in cgdb, the output to the log file is in Machine Interface mode. I had it explained on stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3862210/gdb-log-file-format cgdb version 0.6.5 GNU gdb (GDB) Red Hat Enterprise Linux (7.0.1-23.el5_5.2) Though it was worth reporting. Cheers! |
From: Mike H. <mik...@ya...> - 2010-06-23 12:47:18
|
Sorry I've had to leave this for a while. I haven't had time to get the highlighting correct, I just verified that I could make the changes. Will post a patch when I've got the highlighting correct. ----- Original Message ---- From: Bob Rossi <bo...@br...> To: cgd...@li... Sent: Wed, 23 June, 2010 13:09:48 Subject: Re: [Cgdb-users] Fortran Syntax highlighting not working? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:56:27AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:53:07PM +0000, Mike Hudson wrote: > > Cheers, that worked great. > > If you send in the patch, we can apply it to CGDB for you. Any patch? Bob Rossi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Cgdb-users mailing list Cgd...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-23 12:10:39
|
On Thu, Jun 03, 2010 at 10:56:10AM +0200, Martin Mizera wrote: > Hi Bob, > It would be great if you can look at it! Have you resolved this, or does it still need some attention? Thanks, Bob Rossi |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-23 12:10:02
|
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 02:01:50PM +0200, ayman KHAMOUMA wrote: > My mistake > I was using ubuntu's repository version of cgdb. > I downloaded the sources, and now I don't have the issue anymore. That's great, I added a feature that uses readline's settings, which distro's often map in /etc/inputrc. You are probably picking up that feature. Thanks, Bob Rossi |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-23 12:10:00
|
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 08:56:27AM -0400, Bob Rossi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:53:07PM +0000, Mike Hudson wrote: > > Cheers, that worked great. > > If you send in the patch, we can apply it to CGDB for you. Any patch? Bob Rossi |
From: ayman K. <ka...@gm...> - 2010-06-23 12:01:58
|
My mistake I was using ubuntu's repository version of cgdb. I downloaded the sources, and now I don't have the issue anymore. Regards, Ayman |
From: ayman K. <ka...@gm...> - 2010-06-22 16:27:19
|
Hi, I'm facing some issues with <Home> and <end> keys. when I hit one of these keys I switch to cgdb mode. But this does not happen with <page up>, <page Dwn>. with <insert> and <del> I have another behaviour: nothing happens... no insertion, no suppression... My configuration is: xterm/byobu/zsh I have tried the timeout options but still nothing... Any Idea about this issue ? Regards, Ayman Khamouma |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-15 12:56:51
|
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 12:53:07PM +0000, Mike Hudson wrote: > Cheers, that worked great. If you send in the patch, we can apply it to CGDB for you. Thanks, Bob Rossi |
From: Mike H. <mik...@ya...> - 2010-06-15 12:53:15
|
Cheers, that worked great. ----- Original Message ---- From: Bob Rossi <bo...@br...> To: cgd...@li... Sent: Tue, 15 June, 2010 12:33:28 Subject: Re: [Cgdb-users] Fortran Syntax highlighting not working? On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:44:30AM +0000, Mike Hudson wrote: > Hi, > > I have just recently started using cgdb for fortran after using it for a while for C. Cgdb seems to recognise that it is working with fortran. In fact it is C code that calls the main FORTRAN routine, and when I step into it, the cgdb output reads: > > Current language: auto > The current source language is "auto; currently fortran". > > But none of the code in the display is highlighted, not even the comments are differentiated. > I have looked at the syntax highlighting documentation, but it only seems to deal with modifying the colours of known types of code, rather than defining the actual scheme. > > [How] can I view/modify/fix the syntax highlighting scheme currently used by cgdb? I am running cgdb 0.6.5 on debian 2.6.32-3-amd64. > Any other insights into cgdb+fortran gratefully received! It's relatively easy to add a new syntax highlighter for cgdb. If you look in cgdb/tokenizer/include/tokenizer.h, that defines a very simple interface. It includes a token kind, a token language, and some functions that cgdb will call. In cgdb/tokenizer/src/ there is a flex lexer for each supported language, currently c and ada. You'll have to add fortranlexer.l and then modify tokenizer.c to use that tokenizer when necessary (depending on the file extension). That's about it. After that, cgdb should highlight your files. It's been a long time since I've looked at this, but I think the above instructions are pretty accurate. It shouldn't take more than a few hours to get it working. Let me know. Thanks, Bob Rossi ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Cgdb-users mailing list Cgd...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-15 11:33:39
|
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:44:30AM +0000, Mike Hudson wrote: > Hi, > > I have just recently started using cgdb for fortran after using it for a while for C. Cgdb seems to recognise that it is working with fortran. In fact it is C code that calls the main FORTRAN routine, and when I step into it, the cgdb output reads: > > Current language: auto > The current source language is "auto; currently fortran". > > But none of the code in the display is highlighted, not even the comments are differentiated. > I have looked at the syntax highlighting documentation, but it only seems to deal with modifying the colours of known types of code, rather than defining the actual scheme. > > [How] can I view/modify/fix the syntax highlighting scheme currently used by cgdb? I am running cgdb 0.6.5 on debian 2.6.32-3-amd64. > Any other insights into cgdb+fortran gratefully received! It's relatively easy to add a new syntax highlighter for cgdb. If you look in cgdb/tokenizer/include/tokenizer.h, that defines a very simple interface. It includes a token kind, a token language, and some functions that cgdb will call. In cgdb/tokenizer/src/ there is a flex lexer for each supported language, currently c and ada. You'll have to add fortranlexer.l and then modify tokenizer.c to use that tokenizer when necessary (depending on the file extension). That's about it. After that, cgdb should highlight your files. It's been a long time since I've looked at this, but I think the above instructions are pretty accurate. It shouldn't take more than a few hours to get it working. Let me know. Thanks, Bob Rossi |
From: Mike H. <mik...@ya...> - 2010-06-15 10:44:37
|
Hi, I have just recently started using cgdb for fortran after using it for a while for C. Cgdb seems to recognise that it is working with fortran. In fact it is C code that calls the main FORTRAN routine, and when I step into it, the cgdb output reads: Current language: auto The current source language is "auto; currently fortran". But none of the code in the display is highlighted, not even the comments are differentiated. I have looked at the syntax highlighting documentation, but it only seems to deal with modifying the colours of known types of code, rather than defining the actual scheme. [How] can I view/modify/fix the syntax highlighting scheme currently used by cgdb? I am running cgdb 0.6.5 on debian 2.6.32-3-amd64. Any other insights into cgdb+fortran gratefully received! Cheers! |
From: Martin M. <mar...@gm...> - 2010-06-03 08:56:17
|
Hi Bob, It would be great if you can look at it! Thanks Martin On 3 June 2010 00:58, Bob Rossi <bo...@br...> wrote: > Hi, > > I haven't tried CGDB in this way before. I won't have time > for at least a week (as i'm on vacation), but after that > perhaps I can look into this for you. > > Bob > > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:33AM +0200, Martin Mizera wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm using gdb remote debugging: >> on target machine(ip address 10.20.30.40, process to debug PID >> 2345)(its that one, which I want to debug) I start gdbserver like >> this: >> gdbserver HOST:2345 --attach 1234 ( I simply attach to process) >> >> on my local machine, I can connect by : gdb binaty and than in gdb >> window write target remote 10.20.30.40:2345 >> Every thing works ok. >> >> If I use cgdb instead gdb on my machine, the upper window (where is >> code displayed) is not corresponding with remote binary ( I mean, that >> is not updated if I write "n" (next) to gdb window, it points still to >> same place in the code) >> >> So my question is: Supports cgdb remote debugging via gdbserver? >> If yes, can you write me, what am I doing wrong? >> >> Thanks and have a nice day :-) >> Martin >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Cgdb-users mailing list >> Cgd...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate > GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the > lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: > http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo > _______________________________________________ > Cgdb-users mailing list > Cgd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users > |
From: Bob R. <bo...@br...> - 2010-06-02 23:58:57
|
Hi, I haven't tried CGDB in this way before. I won't have time for at least a week (as i'm on vacation), but after that perhaps I can look into this for you. Bob On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 10:27:33AM +0200, Martin Mizera wrote: > Hello, > I'm using gdb remote debugging: > on target machine(ip address 10.20.30.40, process to debug PID > 2345)(its that one, which I want to debug) I start gdbserver like > this: > gdbserver HOST:2345 --attach 1234 ( I simply attach to process) > > on my local machine, I can connect by : gdb binaty and than in gdb > window write target remote 10.20.30.40:2345 > Every thing works ok. > > If I use cgdb instead gdb on my machine, the upper window (where is > code displayed) is not corresponding with remote binary ( I mean, that > is not updated if I write "n" (next) to gdb window, it points still to > same place in the code) > > So my question is: Supports cgdb remote debugging via gdbserver? > If yes, can you write me, what am I doing wrong? > > Thanks and have a nice day :-) > Martin > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > Cgdb-users mailing list > Cgd...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cgdb-users |
From: Martin M. <mar...@gm...> - 2010-06-02 08:27:41
|
Hello, I'm using gdb remote debugging: on target machine(ip address 10.20.30.40, process to debug PID 2345)(its that one, which I want to debug) I start gdbserver like this: gdbserver HOST:2345 --attach 1234 ( I simply attach to process) on my local machine, I can connect by : gdb binaty and than in gdb window write target remote 10.20.30.40:2345 Every thing works ok. If I use cgdb instead gdb on my machine, the upper window (where is code displayed) is not corresponding with remote binary ( I mean, that is not updated if I write "n" (next) to gdb window, it points still to same place in the code) So my question is: Supports cgdb remote debugging via gdbserver? If yes, can you write me, what am I doing wrong? Thanks and have a nice day :-) Martin |
From: Mike M. <mi...@su...> - 2009-11-17 19:23:32
|
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 02:01:39AM +0100, kamou wrote: > Hello everybody, > Is it possible to split the cgdb screens vertically instead of horizontaly ? > with the new widescreen monitors, a lot of space is lost with the actual > screen configuration... > Splitting it vertically (in my point of view) would be way more produtive on > those monitors (better source code visibility + longer gdb screen history) Hey Ayman, It's not possible today. It might happen in a distant future where we actually have time to work on cgdb, or if someone undertakes the effort and sends us a patch. The display code isn't written in a way to make a change like this easy, unfortunately. Regards, Mike -- Mike Mueller mi...@su... |