Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

[Vincent T. <vt...@un...>]

On Sat, 30 Jan 2010, Pedro Alves wrote:

> On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes
>> in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a problem.
>
> ???  The data -g puts in the dll doesn't contribute a single byte
> to what the dll takes in memory.

ok, but runtime startup is a lot bigger

Vincent Torri