Re: [Cegcc-devel] ported packages : new version

[Pedro A. <pe...@co...>]

On Saturday 30 January 2010 07:13:55, Vincent Torri wrote:

> -g is not an option. The dll would be too big. The fact that a dll takes 
> in memory a multiple of 64KB is already a problem.

???  The data -g puts in the dll doesn't contribute a single byte
to what the dll takes in memory.

-- 
Pedro Alves