You can subscribe to this list here.
2006 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
(63) |
Sep
(78) |
Oct
(111) |
Nov
(104) |
Dec
(39) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2007 |
Jan
(69) |
Feb
(68) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(61) |
May
(56) |
Jun
(122) |
Jul
(82) |
Aug
(44) |
Sep
(63) |
Oct
(73) |
Nov
(77) |
Dec
(102) |
2008 |
Jan
(34) |
Feb
(51) |
Mar
(39) |
Apr
(43) |
May
(8) |
Jun
(59) |
Jul
(69) |
Aug
(97) |
Sep
(140) |
Oct
(72) |
Nov
(37) |
Dec
(35) |
2009 |
Jan
(70) |
Feb
(104) |
Mar
(42) |
Apr
(121) |
May
(161) |
Jun
(109) |
Jul
(90) |
Aug
(85) |
Sep
(104) |
Oct
(59) |
Nov
(76) |
Dec
(145) |
2010 |
Jan
(123) |
Feb
(45) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(9) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
|
Sep
(4) |
Oct
(5) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(83) |
2011 |
Jan
(19) |
Feb
(33) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(4) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(8) |
2012 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(4) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
(5) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2015 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-26 09:11:04
|
Bugs item #2958451, was opened at 2010-02-25 01:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: CeGCC (arm-wince-cegcc) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I tried compile sed, wget , gawk Initial Comment: I use Ubuntu 9.04 and cegcc-0.59.1.tar.bz2 . I tried compile sed-4.2.1.tar.bz2 but error. ----------------------------------------------------- -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT utils.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utils.Tpo -c -o utils.o utils.c utils.c: In function 'follow_symlink': utils.c:363: error: 'S_IFLNK' undeclared (first use in this function) utils.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once utils.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.) utils.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'readlink' ----------------------------------------------------------- opt/cegcc/arm-cegcc/include/sys/stat.h ------------------------------------------------------------- #ifdef __CYGWIN__ #include <cygwin/stat.h> #ifdef _COMPILING_NEWLIB #define stat64 __stat64 #endif #else struct stat { dev_t st_dev; ino_t st_ino; mode_t st_mode; nlink_t st_nlink; uid_t st_uid; gid_t st_gid; dev_t st_rdev; off_t st_size; /* SysV/sco doesn't have the rest... But Solaris, eabi does. */ #if defined(__svr4__) && !defined(__PPC__) && !defined(__sun__) time_t st_atime; time_t st_mtime; time_t st_ctime; #else time_t st_atime; long st_spare1; time_t st_mtime; long st_spare2; time_t st_ctime; long st_spare3; long st_blksize; long st_blocks; long st_spare4[2]; #endif }; #endif #define _IFMT 0170000 /* type of file */ #define _IFDIR 0040000 /* directory */ #define _IFCHR 0020000 /* character special */ #define _IFBLK 0060000 /* block special */ #define _IFREG 0100000 /* regular */ #define _IFLNK 0120000 /* symbolic link */ #define _IFSOCK 0140000 /* socket */ #define _IFIFO 0010000 /* fifo */ #define S_BLKSIZE 1024 /* size of a block */ #define S_ISUID 0004000 /* set user id on execution */ #define S_ISGID 0002000 /* set group id on execution */ #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE #define S_ISVTX 0001000 /* save swapped text even after use */ #define S_IREAD 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWRITE 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IEXEC 0000100 /* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_ENFMT 0002000 /* enforcement-mode locking */ #define S_IFMT _IFMT #define S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define S_IFBLK _IFBLK #define S_IFREG _IFREG #define S_IFLNK _IFLNK #define S_IFSOCK _IFSOCK #define S_IFIFO _IFIFO #endif /* !_POSIX_SOURCE */ #ifdef _WIN32 /* The Windows header files define _S_ forms of these, so we do too for easier portability. */ #define _S_IFMT _IFMT #define _S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define _S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define _S_IFIFO _IFIFO #define _S_IFREG _IFREG #define _S_IREAD 0000400 #define _S_IWRITE 0000200 #define _S_IEXEC 0000100 #endif #define S_IRWXU (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR) #define S_IRUSR 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWUSR 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IXUSR 0000100/* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_IRWXG (S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IXGRP) #define S_IRGRP 0000040 /* read permission, group */ #define S_IWGRP 0000020 /* write permission, grougroup */ #define S_IXGRP 0000010/* execute/search permission, group */ #define S_IRWXO (S_IROTH | S_IWOTH | S_IXOTH) #define S_IROTH 0000004 /* read permission, other */ #define S_IWOTH 0000002 /* write permission, other */ #define S_IXOTH 0000001/* execute/search permission, other */ #define S_ISBLK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFBLK) #define S_ISCHR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFCHR) #define S_ISDIR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFDIR) #define S_ISFIFO(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFIFO) #define S_ISREG(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFREG) #define S_ISLNK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFLNK) #define S_ISSOCK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFSOCK) int _EXFUN(chmod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(fchmod,(int __fd, mode_t __mode)); int _EXFUN(fstat,( int __fd, struct stat *__sbuf )); int _EXFUN(mkdir,( const char *_path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(mkfifo,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(stat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__sbuf )); mode_t _EXFUN(umask,( mode_t __mask )); #if defined(__rtems__) || defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(__INSIDE_CYGWIN__) int _EXFUN(lstat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__buf )); int _EXFUN(mknod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode, dev_t __dev )); #endif -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not use Cygwin. I tried compile wget-1.12 , but error ------------------------------------------------------------ arm-cegcc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT strcasestr.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strcasestr.Tpo -c -o strcasestr.o strcasestr.c In file included from strcasestr.c:27: ./strings.h:27:26: error: strings.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [strcasestr.o] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- I tried compile gawk-3.1.7 , but error. ---------------------------------------------------------------- arm-cegcc-gcc -DDEFPATH="\".:/usr/local/wince/share/awk\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGAWK -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/wince/share/locale\"" -I. -I./libsigsegv/src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 -DNO_ERRNO_H -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT replace.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/replace.Tpo -c -o replace.o replace.c In file included from replace.c:47: missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before numeric constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: conflicting types for 'r_fatal' missing_d/system.c:19: note: a parameter list with an ellipsis can't match an empty parameter name list declaration awk.h:1162: note: previous declaration of 'r_fatal' was here missing_d/system.c: In function 'system': missing_d/system.c:24: error: argument 's' doesn't match prototype /opt/cegcc/lib/gcc/arm-cegcc/4.4.0/../../../../arm-cegcc/include/stdlib.h:122: error: prototype declaration make[2]: *** [replace.o] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Date: 2010-02-26 09:11 Message: config.sub change because use "--host=arm-cegcc" ------------------------------------------------------- c90) basic_machine=c90-cray os=-unicos ;; cegcc) basic_machine=arm-unknown os=-cegcc ;; ---------------------------------------------------------- | -chorusos* | -chorusrdb* | -cegcc* \ ------------------------------------------------------------ PATH=/opt/cegcc/bin:$PATH wget12 ./configure CC=arm-cegcc-gcc --prefix=/usr/local/wince --host=arm-cegcc LDFLAGS="-s" CPPFLAGS="-D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -DNO_ERRNO_H" CFLAGS="-O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields" --disable-opie --disable-digest --disable-ntlm --disable-debug --disable-largefile --disable-rpath --disable-ipv6 --disable-nls --disable-iri gawk and sed ./configure CC=arm-cegcc-gcc --prefix=/usr/local/wince --host=arm-cegcc LDFLAGS="-s" CPPFLAGS="-D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400" CFLAGS="-O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields" "LDFLAGS: --enable-auto-import" is configure error, so I'm not use. --------------------------------------------------------- I hope use wget and emacs. automake autoconf bison install ok. But texinfo gettext ncurses pdcurses ... are error. Configure check and make error says glibc headerfile not found. I can't compile wget and emacs. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Danny Backx (dannybackx) Date: 2010-02-25 16:35 Message: What is your point ? I created a small test : #include <sys/stat.h> int x() { return S_IFLNK; } arm-cegcc-gcc -c test.c compiles this without problem. So I guess you may be using something different ? Also, I am not sure why you expect a source not written for CE to compile with cegcc without a problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-25 16:35:15
|
Bugs item #2958451, was opened at 2010-02-25 02:19 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dannybackx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: CeGCC (arm-wince-cegcc) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I tried compile sed, wget , gawk Initial Comment: I use Ubuntu 9.04 and cegcc-0.59.1.tar.bz2 . I tried compile sed-4.2.1.tar.bz2 but error. ----------------------------------------------------- -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT utils.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utils.Tpo -c -o utils.o utils.c utils.c: In function 'follow_symlink': utils.c:363: error: 'S_IFLNK' undeclared (first use in this function) utils.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once utils.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.) utils.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'readlink' ----------------------------------------------------------- opt/cegcc/arm-cegcc/include/sys/stat.h ------------------------------------------------------------- #ifdef __CYGWIN__ #include <cygwin/stat.h> #ifdef _COMPILING_NEWLIB #define stat64 __stat64 #endif #else struct stat { dev_t st_dev; ino_t st_ino; mode_t st_mode; nlink_t st_nlink; uid_t st_uid; gid_t st_gid; dev_t st_rdev; off_t st_size; /* SysV/sco doesn't have the rest... But Solaris, eabi does. */ #if defined(__svr4__) && !defined(__PPC__) && !defined(__sun__) time_t st_atime; time_t st_mtime; time_t st_ctime; #else time_t st_atime; long st_spare1; time_t st_mtime; long st_spare2; time_t st_ctime; long st_spare3; long st_blksize; long st_blocks; long st_spare4[2]; #endif }; #endif #define _IFMT 0170000 /* type of file */ #define _IFDIR 0040000 /* directory */ #define _IFCHR 0020000 /* character special */ #define _IFBLK 0060000 /* block special */ #define _IFREG 0100000 /* regular */ #define _IFLNK 0120000 /* symbolic link */ #define _IFSOCK 0140000 /* socket */ #define _IFIFO 0010000 /* fifo */ #define S_BLKSIZE 1024 /* size of a block */ #define S_ISUID 0004000 /* set user id on execution */ #define S_ISGID 0002000 /* set group id on execution */ #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE #define S_ISVTX 0001000 /* save swapped text even after use */ #define S_IREAD 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWRITE 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IEXEC 0000100 /* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_ENFMT 0002000 /* enforcement-mode locking */ #define S_IFMT _IFMT #define S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define S_IFBLK _IFBLK #define S_IFREG _IFREG #define S_IFLNK _IFLNK #define S_IFSOCK _IFSOCK #define S_IFIFO _IFIFO #endif /* !_POSIX_SOURCE */ #ifdef _WIN32 /* The Windows header files define _S_ forms of these, so we do too for easier portability. */ #define _S_IFMT _IFMT #define _S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define _S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define _S_IFIFO _IFIFO #define _S_IFREG _IFREG #define _S_IREAD 0000400 #define _S_IWRITE 0000200 #define _S_IEXEC 0000100 #endif #define S_IRWXU (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR) #define S_IRUSR 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWUSR 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IXUSR 0000100/* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_IRWXG (S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IXGRP) #define S_IRGRP 0000040 /* read permission, group */ #define S_IWGRP 0000020 /* write permission, grougroup */ #define S_IXGRP 0000010/* execute/search permission, group */ #define S_IRWXO (S_IROTH | S_IWOTH | S_IXOTH) #define S_IROTH 0000004 /* read permission, other */ #define S_IWOTH 0000002 /* write permission, other */ #define S_IXOTH 0000001/* execute/search permission, other */ #define S_ISBLK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFBLK) #define S_ISCHR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFCHR) #define S_ISDIR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFDIR) #define S_ISFIFO(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFIFO) #define S_ISREG(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFREG) #define S_ISLNK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFLNK) #define S_ISSOCK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFSOCK) int _EXFUN(chmod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(fchmod,(int __fd, mode_t __mode)); int _EXFUN(fstat,( int __fd, struct stat *__sbuf )); int _EXFUN(mkdir,( const char *_path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(mkfifo,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(stat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__sbuf )); mode_t _EXFUN(umask,( mode_t __mask )); #if defined(__rtems__) || defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(__INSIDE_CYGWIN__) int _EXFUN(lstat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__buf )); int _EXFUN(mknod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode, dev_t __dev )); #endif -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not use Cygwin. I tried compile wget-1.12 , but error ------------------------------------------------------------ arm-cegcc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT strcasestr.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strcasestr.Tpo -c -o strcasestr.o strcasestr.c In file included from strcasestr.c:27: ./strings.h:27:26: error: strings.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [strcasestr.o] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- I tried compile gawk-3.1.7 , but error. ---------------------------------------------------------------- arm-cegcc-gcc -DDEFPATH="\".:/usr/local/wince/share/awk\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGAWK -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/wince/share/locale\"" -I. -I./libsigsegv/src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 -DNO_ERRNO_H -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT replace.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/replace.Tpo -c -o replace.o replace.c In file included from replace.c:47: missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before numeric constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: conflicting types for 'r_fatal' missing_d/system.c:19: note: a parameter list with an ellipsis can't match an empty parameter name list declaration awk.h:1162: note: previous declaration of 'r_fatal' was here missing_d/system.c: In function 'system': missing_d/system.c:24: error: argument 's' doesn't match prototype /opt/cegcc/lib/gcc/arm-cegcc/4.4.0/../../../../arm-cegcc/include/stdlib.h:122: error: prototype declaration make[2]: *** [replace.o] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Danny Backx (dannybackx) Date: 2010-02-25 17:35 Message: What is your point ? I created a small test : #include <sys/stat.h> int x() { return S_IFLNK; } arm-cegcc-gcc -c test.c compiles this without problem. So I guess you may be using something different ? Also, I am not sure why you expect a source not written for CE to compile with cegcc without a problem. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-25 01:19:36
|
Bugs item #2958451, was opened at 2010-02-25 01:19 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: CeGCC (arm-wince-cegcc) Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: I tried compile sed, wget , gawk Initial Comment: I use Ubuntu 9.04 and cegcc-0.59.1.tar.bz2 . I tried compile sed-4.2.1.tar.bz2 but error. ----------------------------------------------------- -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT utils.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/utils.Tpo -c -o utils.o utils.c utils.c: In function 'follow_symlink': utils.c:363: error: 'S_IFLNK' undeclared (first use in this function) utils.c:363: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once utils.c:363: error: for each function it appears in.) utils.c:371: warning: implicit declaration of function 'readlink' ----------------------------------------------------------- opt/cegcc/arm-cegcc/include/sys/stat.h ------------------------------------------------------------- #ifdef __CYGWIN__ #include <cygwin/stat.h> #ifdef _COMPILING_NEWLIB #define stat64 __stat64 #endif #else struct stat { dev_t st_dev; ino_t st_ino; mode_t st_mode; nlink_t st_nlink; uid_t st_uid; gid_t st_gid; dev_t st_rdev; off_t st_size; /* SysV/sco doesn't have the rest... But Solaris, eabi does. */ #if defined(__svr4__) && !defined(__PPC__) && !defined(__sun__) time_t st_atime; time_t st_mtime; time_t st_ctime; #else time_t st_atime; long st_spare1; time_t st_mtime; long st_spare2; time_t st_ctime; long st_spare3; long st_blksize; long st_blocks; long st_spare4[2]; #endif }; #endif #define _IFMT 0170000 /* type of file */ #define _IFDIR 0040000 /* directory */ #define _IFCHR 0020000 /* character special */ #define _IFBLK 0060000 /* block special */ #define _IFREG 0100000 /* regular */ #define _IFLNK 0120000 /* symbolic link */ #define _IFSOCK 0140000 /* socket */ #define _IFIFO 0010000 /* fifo */ #define S_BLKSIZE 1024 /* size of a block */ #define S_ISUID 0004000 /* set user id on execution */ #define S_ISGID 0002000 /* set group id on execution */ #ifndef _POSIX_SOURCE #define S_ISVTX 0001000 /* save swapped text even after use */ #define S_IREAD 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWRITE 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IEXEC 0000100 /* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_ENFMT 0002000 /* enforcement-mode locking */ #define S_IFMT _IFMT #define S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define S_IFBLK _IFBLK #define S_IFREG _IFREG #define S_IFLNK _IFLNK #define S_IFSOCK _IFSOCK #define S_IFIFO _IFIFO #endif /* !_POSIX_SOURCE */ #ifdef _WIN32 /* The Windows header files define _S_ forms of these, so we do too for easier portability. */ #define _S_IFMT _IFMT #define _S_IFDIR _IFDIR #define _S_IFCHR _IFCHR #define _S_IFIFO _IFIFO #define _S_IFREG _IFREG #define _S_IREAD 0000400 #define _S_IWRITE 0000200 #define _S_IEXEC 0000100 #endif #define S_IRWXU (S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IXUSR) #define S_IRUSR 0000400 /* read permission, owner */ #define S_IWUSR 0000200 /* write permission, owner */ #define S_IXUSR 0000100/* execute/search permission, owner */ #define S_IRWXG (S_IRGRP | S_IWGRP | S_IXGRP) #define S_IRGRP 0000040 /* read permission, group */ #define S_IWGRP 0000020 /* write permission, grougroup */ #define S_IXGRP 0000010/* execute/search permission, group */ #define S_IRWXO (S_IROTH | S_IWOTH | S_IXOTH) #define S_IROTH 0000004 /* read permission, other */ #define S_IWOTH 0000002 /* write permission, other */ #define S_IXOTH 0000001/* execute/search permission, other */ #define S_ISBLK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFBLK) #define S_ISCHR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFCHR) #define S_ISDIR(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFDIR) #define S_ISFIFO(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFIFO) #define S_ISREG(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFREG) #define S_ISLNK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFLNK) #define S_ISSOCK(m) (((m)&_IFMT) == _IFSOCK) int _EXFUN(chmod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(fchmod,(int __fd, mode_t __mode)); int _EXFUN(fstat,( int __fd, struct stat *__sbuf )); int _EXFUN(mkdir,( const char *_path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(mkfifo,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode )); int _EXFUN(stat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__sbuf )); mode_t _EXFUN(umask,( mode_t __mask )); #if defined(__rtems__) || defined(__CYGWIN__) && !defined(__INSIDE_CYGWIN__) int _EXFUN(lstat,( const char *__path, struct stat *__buf )); int _EXFUN(mknod,( const char *__path, mode_t __mode, dev_t __dev )); #endif -------------------------------------------------------------- I'm not use Cygwin. I tried compile wget-1.12 , but error ------------------------------------------------------------ arm-cegcc-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT strcasestr.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/strcasestr.Tpo -c -o strcasestr.o strcasestr.c In file included from strcasestr.c:27: ./strings.h:27:26: error: strings.h: No such file or directory make[3]: *** [strcasestr.o] Error 1 ---------------------------------------------------------------- I tried compile gawk-3.1.7 , but error. ---------------------------------------------------------------- arm-cegcc-gcc -DDEFPATH="\".:/usr/local/wince/share/awk\"" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DGAWK -DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/local/wince/share/locale\"" -I. -I./libsigsegv/src -D_WIN32_WCE=0x0400 -D_WIN32_IE=0x0400 -DNO_ERRNO_H -O3 -Wall -mms-bitfields -MT replace.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/replace.Tpo -c -o replace.o replace.c In file included from replace.c:47: missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before string constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: expected declaration specifiers or '...' before numeric constant missing_d/system.c:19: error: conflicting types for 'r_fatal' missing_d/system.c:19: note: a parameter list with an ellipsis can't match an empty parameter name list declaration awk.h:1162: note: previous declaration of 'r_fatal' was here missing_d/system.c: In function 'system': missing_d/system.c:24: error: argument 's' doesn't match prototype /opt/cegcc/lib/gcc/arm-cegcc/4.4.0/../../../../arm-cegcc/include/stdlib.h:122: error: prototype declaration make[2]: *** [replace.o] -------------------------------------------------------------------- Thanks, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865514&aid=2958451&group_id=173455 |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-24 19:44:42
|
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 09:57 +0100, Anders Nilsson Plymoth wrote: > I wonder what the status is on including pthreads into the build > configuration. There is an option when compiling the gcc sources to > turn this on, but this option is currently turned off for cegcc. I > tried enabling it, but there are propagating dependency issues from > the cegcc build scripts that results in some standard header files not > being found. Since pthreads is widely used among gcc developers to a > very high degree, I really think this feature should be enabled by > default. I use gcc and pthreads for all my UNIX apps, so pthreads > really needs to available in cegcc before it can be of any use for > me. I'm not entirely sure what you're asking. cegcc (allow me to focus on the arm-mingw32ce flavour for now) gives you a way to compile applications that will then run on a WinCE (Windows Mobile, ..) platform. The WinCE platform doesn't have pthreads - much like the other versions of Windows, see e.g. http://sourceware.org/pthreads-win32 : "Win32 does not, and is unlikely to ever, support pthreads natively. [pthreads-win32] seeks to provide a freely available and high-quality solution to this problem." I would expect that you start by picking up a version of pthreads that can run on CE, and then link applications against it. I'm not sure whether this requires the build process of cegcc to change. The current build script says --enable-threads=win32 (not what I would call "turned off"), according to the gcc NEWS file it should be --enable-threads=posix for pthreads. Is that what you tried, and did you have pthreads source on your system when you tried it ? Compiling gthr-posix.h requires pthread.h . Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Anders N. P. <lan...@gm...> - 2010-02-24 08:58:26
|
Hi, I wonder what the status is on including pthreads into the build configuration. There is an option when compiling the gcc sources to turn this on, but this option is currently turned off for cegcc. I tried enabling it, but there are propagating dependency issues from the cegcc build scripts that results in some standard header files not being found. Since pthreads is widely used among gcc developers to a very high degree, I really think this feature should be enabled by default. I use gcc and pthreads for all my UNIX apps, so pthreads really needs to available in cegcc before it can be of any use for me. Is this really disabled, or am I missing something here? Thanks, Anders |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-20 09:43:36
|
Patches item #2954077, was opened at 2010-02-18 10:05 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by dannybackx You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865516&aid=2954077&group_id=173455 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Radics Peter (mitch0) >Assigned to: Danny Backx (dannybackx) Summary: configure fix for building on freebsd Initial Comment: The configure scripts under src/gcc and src/gcc-4.4.0 incorrectly use ${target} when trying to locate libgmp and libmpfr on freebsd hosts. I moved the check to a different case which checks ${host} instead. Patch attached, it was made against r1444. cheers, mitch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Danny Backx (dannybackx) Date: 2010-02-20 10:43 Message: Two remarks : - the real fix is not to configure but to configure.ac - this should be reported to the gcc bugzilla, it's not cegcc specific. I'll make the change to cegcc too if you get approval from the gcc folks. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865516&aid=2954077&group_id=173455 |
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2010-02-18 09:05:23
|
Patches item #2954077, was opened at 2010-02-18 10:05 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by mitch0 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865516&aid=2954077&group_id=173455 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: Radics Peter (mitch0) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: configure fix for building on freebsd Initial Comment: The configure scripts under src/gcc and src/gcc-4.4.0 incorrectly use ${target} when trying to locate libgmp and libmpfr on freebsd hosts. I moved the check to a different case which checks ${host} instead. Patch attached, it was made against r1444. cheers, mitch ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=865516&aid=2954077&group_id=173455 |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-15 20:30:37
|
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 17:21 -0200, Daniel Monteiro wrote: > Ok, forget about it. Just got it working. > I will soon write a little guide to get things working and I will let > you guys know, in case you're curious. Yes, please do. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Daniel M. <mon...@gm...> - 2010-02-15 19:21:57
|
Ok, forget about it. Just got it working. I will soon write a little guide to get things working and I will let you guys know, in case you're curious. thanks for the help. Daniel Monteiro ======================================== |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! ======================================== 2010/2/15 Daniel Monteiro <mon...@gm...> > Some update on the issue: > Got to compile the code with some minor modification but now, when running > on my device (a Dell Axim x50v running Windows Mobile 5) it complaing with > some invalid characters followed by "failed (12296)". Is there any lookup > table where I can take a look at the error codes? Is this a typical error? > > thanks > > > Daniel Monteiro > ======================================== > |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 > |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ > |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! > ======================================== > > > 2010/2/10 Daniel Monteiro <mon...@gm...> > > I`ve not implemented OpenGL, but rather a simpler software renderer that >> sits on top of SDL+SDL_gfx. If it performs well under linux for the same >> processor and doesnt under WinMo, than SDL or WinMo is the cullprit - but >> since SDL is using GAPI, I hardly suspect of SDL. >> >> cheers >> >> >> Daniel Monteiro >> ======================================== >> |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 >> |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ >> |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! >> ======================================== >> >> >> 2010/2/10 Vincent Richomme <fo...@sm...> >> >>> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:05:55 -0200, Daniel Monteiro >>> >>> <mon...@gm...> wrote: >>> > Tried that with a SDL app of mine (http://angstron2.garage.maemo.org , >>> the >>> > one Im trying to port to OpenGL ES), but the results were marginally >>> better >>> > (tunning for xscale). Its kind of weird, since I tried it on my >>> > PXA270@315Mhz phone, running one of those chinese linuxes from >>> Motorola >>> and >>> > it performs significantly better (tunned for iwxmmt).Same goes to Nokia >>> > N770 >>> > (Omap1710@200Mhz and bigger resolution, tunned for arm926ej-s). >>> > >>> > This leads me to belive the graphical subsystem is fundamently crippled >>> > with >>> > slow ARM4 code. >>> > >>> yes that's also my opinion about WinMo graphical implementation and >>> that's >>> why Microsoft >>> is really late compared to maemo/iPhone ... >>> but may be due also to your openGL implementation on WM. >>> >>> >> > |
From: Daniel M. <mon...@gm...> - 2010-02-15 19:15:39
|
Some update on the issue: Got to compile the code with some minor modification but now, when running on my device (a Dell Axim x50v running Windows Mobile 5) it complaing with some invalid characters followed by "failed (12296)". Is there any lookup table where I can take a look at the error codes? Is this a typical error? thanks Daniel Monteiro ======================================== |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! ======================================== 2010/2/10 Daniel Monteiro <mon...@gm...> > I`ve not implemented OpenGL, but rather a simpler software renderer that > sits on top of SDL+SDL_gfx. If it performs well under linux for the same > processor and doesnt under WinMo, than SDL or WinMo is the cullprit - but > since SDL is using GAPI, I hardly suspect of SDL. > > cheers > > > Daniel Monteiro > ======================================== > |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 > |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ > |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! > ======================================== > > > 2010/2/10 Vincent Richomme <fo...@sm...> > >> On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:05:55 -0200, Daniel Monteiro >> >> <mon...@gm...> wrote: >> > Tried that with a SDL app of mine (http://angstron2.garage.maemo.org , >> the >> > one Im trying to port to OpenGL ES), but the results were marginally >> better >> > (tunning for xscale). Its kind of weird, since I tried it on my >> > PXA270@315Mhz phone, running one of those chinese linuxes from Motorola >> and >> > it performs significantly better (tunned for iwxmmt).Same goes to Nokia >> > N770 >> > (Omap1710@200Mhz and bigger resolution, tunned for arm926ej-s). >> > >> > This leads me to belive the graphical subsystem is fundamently crippled >> > with >> > slow ARM4 code. >> > >> yes that's also my opinion about WinMo graphical implementation and that's >> why Microsoft >> is really late compared to maemo/iPhone ... >> but may be due also to your openGL implementation on WM. >> >> > |
From: Johnny W. <jwi...@re...> - 2010-02-15 19:10:57
|
Hi, > >> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047 > > > >> Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc > > version > >> (gcc-4.4.3) ? > > > > Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that. > > 4.4.0 is not an old compiler. > > Yeah you are right, I don't think gcc folks fix bugs in their minor > releases. Gcc 4.4.3 has a bug in its optimizer, which will cause problems for ACE, see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42871 Johnny |
From: Vincent R. <fo...@sm...> - 2010-02-12 21:29:56
|
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 20:09:40 +0100, Danny Backx <dan...@sc...> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote: >> Danny, >> >> Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047 > >> Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc > version >> (gcc-4.4.3) ? > > Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that. > 4.4.0 is not an old compiler. Yeah you are right, I don't think gcc folks fix bugs in their minor releases. |
From: Pavel P. <pa...@su...> - 2010-02-12 19:57:35
|
> > > > What about the other problem (that I'm getting unaligned access on > load)? > > I have src code that builds and works just fine with 4.1 build cegcc > svn.1279. The only problem with that build is that the dll has > something corrupt in the PE header and I fix it by upx-compressing it. > But using latest trunk I'm getting unaligned access if the dll is built > using either 4.3 and 4.1 builds of gcc (and upx compression does help > also). > > pS: I'm building ffmpeg using cegcc > > Can you send details about that ? I don't believe I've seen this. > > Otherwise the highest priority I have is getting the ld crash fixed. > That's kind of difficult to do. I built huge project that contains MANY local changes and my own code. It's really difficult to minimize it to pinpoint source of problem. Moreover, it's time consuming to build cegcc and it also takes a lot of time to build my project. I have some minor changes in cegcc by the way, but I doubt that they may have any impact: I modified all *.def files and changed from coredll to coredll.dll instead (otherwise, all SW that links to coredll will stop working if somebody puts coredll.exe into windows folder). When I get a crash I can't even see stack trace (I'm using visual studio). What can I do to see backtrace or print some extra helpful info? I'm getting app crash at the time my dll is loaded (app is built using ms VS, the dll is byult using cegcc) |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-12 19:48:52
|
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 14:24 -0500, Pavel Pavlov wrote: > > > Danny, > > > > > > Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047 > > > > > Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc > > version > > > (gcc-4.4.3) ? > > > > Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that. > > 4.4.0 is not an old compiler. > > > > Danny > > > > > What about the other problem (that I'm getting unaligned access on load)? > I have src code that builds and works just fine with 4.1 build cegcc svn.1279. The only problem with that build is that the dll has something corrupt in the PE header and I fix it by upx-compressing it. But using latest trunk I'm getting unaligned access if the dll is built using either 4.3 and 4.1 builds of gcc (and upx compression does help also). > pS: I'm building ffmpeg using cegcc Can you send details about that ? I don't believe I've seen this. Otherwise the highest priority I have is getting the ld crash fixed. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Pavel P. <pa...@su...> - 2010-02-12 19:25:01
|
> > Danny, > > > > Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047 > > > Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc > version > > (gcc-4.4.3) ? > > Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that. > 4.4.0 is not an old compiler. > > Danny > What about the other problem (that I'm getting unaligned access on load)? I have src code that builds and works just fine with 4.1 build cegcc svn.1279. The only problem with that build is that the dll has something corrupt in the PE header and I fix it by upx-compressing it. But using latest trunk I'm getting unaligned access if the dll is built using either 4.3 and 4.1 builds of gcc (and upx compression does help also). pS: I'm building ffmpeg using cegcc |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-12 19:09:08
|
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:37 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote: > Danny, > > Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43047 > Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc version > (gcc-4.4.3) ? Maybe not difficult, but I am not sure what you hope to prove by that. 4.4.0 is not an old compiler. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Vincent R. <fo...@sm...> - 2010-02-12 10:37:55
|
Danny, Could you give a link to your bugzilla report ? Would it be difficult to apply cegcc changes to the latest gcc version (gcc-4.4.3) ? |
From: Pavel P. <pa...@su...> - 2010-02-12 01:04:29
|
> > I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat > me > > to it :-) > > > Why are you using specific gnu attribute instead of declspec ? > Wben using declspec, does it crash ? > That was preprocessed source. Original file had _declspec(dllimport/export) |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-11 21:33:30
|
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 21:01 +0100, Vincent Richomme wrote: > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:01 +0100, Danny Backx <dan...@sc...> > wrote: > > I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached. > > > > When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below. > > > > I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me > > to it :-) > > > Why are you using specific gnu attribute instead of declspec ? Because that was in the error reported. > Wben using declspec, does it crash ? Yes, the same error occurs. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Vincent R. <fo...@sm...> - 2010-02-11 20:02:00
|
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 20:39:01 +0100, Danny Backx <dan...@sc...> wrote: > I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached. > > When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below. > > I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me > to it :-) > Why are you using specific gnu attribute instead of declspec ? Wben using declspec, does it crash ? |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-11 19:51:07
|
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 20:39 +0100, Danny Backx wrote: > I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached. > > When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below. > > I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me > to it :-) I reported this to the gcc bug database, I have no clue where to look for a solution. Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Danny B. <dan...@sc...> - 2010-02-10 19:38:34
|
I trimmed down the file posted earlier to the source attached. When you define macro CRASH, that's what the compiler does. See below. I'll try to work further from here, but you're quite welcome to beat me to it :-) When running this with -v it is clear - if the error message wasn't already - that the compiler itself is crashing. That's the thing that creates an assembler file, which is then meant to be treated by the assembler (as), part of binutils. It never gets to as. Danny pavilion: {101} arm-mingw32ce-gcc -c -DCRASH k.c k.c: In function 'ff_fill_linesize': k.c:12: error: unrecognizable insn: (insn 6 5 7 3 k.c:9 (set (reg/f:SI 136 [ av_pix_fmt_descriptors.0 ]) (symbol_ref:SI ("av_pix_fmt_descriptors") [flags 0x440] <var_decl 0xb7da9000 av_pix_fmt_descriptors>)) -1 (nil)) k.c:12: internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2048 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. pavilion: {102} arm-mingw32ce-gcc -c k.c k.c:4: warning: array 'av_pix_fmt_descriptors' assumed to have one element pavilion: {103} -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info |
From: Pavel P. <pa...@su...> - 2010-02-10 18:28:22
|
> > > I just took latest svn cegcc and wanted to test if the loading > error > > > was fixed (the infamous problem that is only fixed by using upx). > > > > Partially. It may work for you, give it a try. > > > > Surprisingly, I got opposite behavior with the dll binaries compiled > with latest cegcc: they load fine without upx compression and do not > load at all if upx-compressed. Anyways, binaries compiled with the > latest cegcc do not work when I use them (app crashes). When dlls are > upx compressed at the time of loading of my app I'm seeing unaligned > access error in vs debugger. > > I tried to compile latest cegcc svn version with export gcc_src=gcc which builds previous gcc instead of gcc4.4. Everything compiled well, but I still got the same unaligned access exception on startup. That's really unaligned access exception. The code was something like move r9 [r10] and r10/4 was XXXX.5, which means that r10 did not point to 4-byte aligned memory. Seems like it could be related to binutils?.. |
From: Daniel M. <mon...@gm...> - 2010-02-10 14:16:00
|
I`ve not implemented OpenGL, but rather a simpler software renderer that sits on top of SDL+SDL_gfx. If it performs well under linux for the same processor and doesnt under WinMo, than SDL or WinMo is the cullprit - but since SDL is using GAPI, I hardly suspect of SDL. cheers Daniel Monteiro ======================================== |_|0|_| Linux Registered User #424188 |_|_|0| http://batterypoweredgames.blogspot.com/ |0|0|0| Visit to grab games for your mobile device! ======================================== 2010/2/10 Vincent Richomme <fo...@sm...> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:05:55 -0200, Daniel Monteiro > <mon...@gm...> wrote: > > Tried that with a SDL app of mine (http://angstron2.garage.maemo.org , > the > > one Im trying to port to OpenGL ES), but the results were marginally > better > > (tunning for xscale). Its kind of weird, since I tried it on my > > PXA270@315Mhz phone, running one of those chinese linuxes from Motorola > and > > it performs significantly better (tunned for iwxmmt).Same goes to Nokia > > N770 > > (Omap1710@200Mhz and bigger resolution, tunned for arm926ej-s). > > > > This leads me to belive the graphical subsystem is fundamently crippled > > with > > slow ARM4 code. > > > yes that's also my opinion about WinMo graphical implementation and that's > why Microsoft > is really late compared to maemo/iPhone ... > but may be due also to your openGL implementation on WM. > > |
From: Vincent R. <fo...@sm...> - 2010-02-10 11:14:26
|
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 09:05:55 -0200, Daniel Monteiro <mon...@gm...> wrote: > Tried that with a SDL app of mine (http://angstron2.garage.maemo.org , the > one Im trying to port to OpenGL ES), but the results were marginally better > (tunning for xscale). Its kind of weird, since I tried it on my > PXA270@315Mhz phone, running one of those chinese linuxes from Motorola and > it performs significantly better (tunned for iwxmmt).Same goes to Nokia > N770 > (Omap1710@200Mhz and bigger resolution, tunned for arm926ej-s). > > This leads me to belive the graphical subsystem is fundamently crippled > with > slow ARM4 code. > yes that's also my opinion about WinMo graphical implementation and that's why Microsoft is really late compared to maemo/iPhone ... but may be due also to your openGL implementation on WM. |