Re: [CEDET-devel] How large is the difference between the SF cedet and Emacs cedet (melpa)?

[Vladimir N. <loc...@gm...>]

By the way, ede's default keybinding prefix C-c .
conflicts with org-mode's org-time-stamp command binding.

It's it really the best keybinding prefix?

Vladimir Nikishkin <loc...@gm...> 於 2020年1月16日 週四 11:15 寫道：

> Well, I'm sort of trying to use the sf version now, and it's actually
> working with scheme files better than the built-in one (due to the last
> scheme-related commit?). (In the sense that it doesn't throw exceptions.)
> It can't do a lot more though.
>
> Which tools are still not there?
> The grammars-fw manual and cogre at least...
>
>
> Eric Ludlam <er...@si...> 於 2020年1月16日 週四 10:47 寫道：
>
>> Hi Vladimir,
>>
>> Mainline Emacs version of CEDET has moved past CEDET on sourceforge due
>> to major changes to eieio.  At this point it is not possible to use SF
>> version with newer Emacsen.
>>
>> I have been posting minor patches to Emacs for missing features from SF
>> version, but it is slow going as I have limited time, and I don't have a
>> continous release from my company.  Eventually I'd like to move some of
>> the tools not in Emacs into melpa after updating them to work with newer
>> Emacs, but it will be a while without help.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>> On 1/12/20 1:11 AM, Vladimir Nikishkin wrote:
>> > I am reading the built-in Emacs CEDET manuals, and they are apparently
>> > refencing some CEDET features that are not within a standard Emacs
>> > installation. (For example, cogre is not there. Also the manual
>> > references the grammar-fw info node, which is also not present.)
>> > How large is the difference? Is it worth installing a git version of
>> > cedet for everyday usage (not for development)?
>> >
>> > You know, org-mode is also generally divergent from the main Emacs
>> > tree, but they maintain a separate MELPA repository, which allows to
>> > have a "semi-fresh" org installation without interfering with Emacs
>> > proper.  Maybe it is worth making a melpa repository with the latest
>> > CEDET?
>> >
>>
>