Re: [cedet-semantic] C++ Parsing Problem

[Matthias P. <pf...@we...>]

On Sat Jan 12, 2008 at 10:49:36PM +0100, Arne Schmitz wrote:
> Try out this with semantic:
>=20
> class foo
> {
>     int f()
>     {
>         std::vector<int> &a, &b, &c;
>     }
>=20
>     std::vector<int> &a, &b, &c;
> };
>=20
> The second declaration is marked as invalid, although it isn't.

Please, for the non-gurus: What does it mean that this is marked as invalid?
Which cedet-functionality are you refering to? What cedet emmited
message gives you the idea that the second vector is invalid?

matthias