Thread: RE: [CEDET-devel] AW: Re[3]: Thoughts for semantic-regtest.el
Brought to you by:
zappo
From: <kla...@sd...> - 2005-02-15 16:56:10
Attachments:
test.el
|
> I think a good starting point is the definition of the several elisp- > parsers in semantic-el.el - we should at least have one code-exemplar > for each of them. > I had already started with a test.el but not yet finished - i will = send it > to you today evening, Eric, then you can maybe save some time ;-) here is my test.el i mentioned - as already said, just a start... Klaus |
From: Eric M. L. <er...@si...> - 2005-02-17 04:00:36
|
>>> <kla...@sd...> seems to think that: >> I think a good starting point is the definition of the several elisp- >> parsers in semantic-el.el - we should at least have one code-exemplar >> for each of them. > >> I had already started with a test.el but not yet finished - i will = >send it >> to you today evening, Eric, then you can maybe save some time ;-) > >here is my test.el i mentioned - as already said, just a start... [ ... ] I checked in a copy of test.el based on what you wrote. It detected bugs in the lisp parser, so I checked in a new version of that too. Eric -- Eric Ludlam: za...@gn..., er...@si... Home: http://www.ludlam.net Siege: www.siege-engine.com Emacs: http://cedet.sourceforge.net GNU: www.gnu.org |