Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Cdrtools-support] isoinfo -l output, ver 3.02a2
|
From: Joerg S. <Joe...@fo...> - 2016-06-21 12:28:46
|
Leszek Prochniak <pro...@sl...> wrote:
> I have a question about an output of the "isoinfo -l" command. I am using
> isoinfo ver. 3.02a02 on Slackware64-current. Below are partial outputs
> for two exemplary iso files.
>
> 1. isoinfo -l -i gparted-live-0.24.0-2-amd64.iso
>
> Directory listing of /
> dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2048 Oct 28 2015 [ 331 02] .
> dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2048 Oct 28 2015 [ 331 02] ..
> dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2048 Oct 28 2015 [ 334 02] EFI
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 712 Oct 28 2015 [ 357 00] GPARTED_LIVE_VERSION.;1
> -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 18092 Aug 12 2012 [ 358 00] GPL.;1
>
> 2. isoinfo -l -i ADRIANE-KNOPPIX_V7.2.0gCD-2013-07-28-EN.iso
>
> Directory listing of /
> 29 dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2048 Jun 15 2013 [ 29 02] .
> 29 dr-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 2048 Jun 15 2013 [ 29 02] ..
> 3649 -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 54 Jun 17 2001 [ 3649 00] AUTORUN.BAT;1
> 3650 -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 45 Feb 23 2003 [ 3650 00] AUTORUN.INF;1
> 3651 -r-xr-xr-x 1 0 0 967 May 1 2004 [ 3651 00] AUTORUN.PIF;1
>
> The manpage says we should expect the output similar to "ls -lR" so the
> second form is rather unexpected. Moreover, entries in the first column are
> identical to those in square brackets.
> Is there any reason for the second type of output which appears also
> for several other iso files?
The second form appears when the iso image contains inode numbers.
This happens when there is either Rock Ridge and you tell isoinfo to list RR or
when the iso image has been created by a mkisofs version from Autumn 2006 or later.
So in this case, the listing is similar to ls -lRi
BTW: if you like a listing that is identical to the listing from ls, use
isoinfo -i file.iso -find -ls
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@sc... (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joe...@fo... (work) Blog: http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.org/private/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/schilytools/files/'
|
