[Cdrdao-devel] Commitment to gtkmm 2.4 ?

[Denis L. <den...@ya...>]

Should we commit the gcdmaster code to gtkmm 2.4 (and sigc++ 2.0) ? I
was looking over the gtkmm 2.4 patch that was submitted recently, and
it's working fine. Unfortunately, gtkmm 2.4 is not backward compatible
(mainly, but not only, because of the sigc++ 2.0 "upgrade"). It's
possible to keep both compatible through autoconf magic, but it'd
require adding #ifdef's all over the code and is definitely not a
viable long-term solution. What do'y all think ?

I built FC2 packages for both gtkmm 2.2 and gtkmm 2.4 if anyone is
interested, let me know.

-denis