You can subscribe to this list here.
2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
(55) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(28) |
Nov
(35) |
Dec
(19) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2002 |
Jan
(12) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(27) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(42) |
Jul
(22) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(62) |
Oct
(52) |
Nov
(49) |
Dec
(14) |
2003 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(41) |
Mar
(16) |
Apr
(18) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(4) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(6) |
Dec
(5) |
2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(32) |
Mar
(10) |
Apr
(5) |
May
|
Jun
(6) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(7) |
Mar
(4) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
(4) |
2006 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(2) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(7) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2008 |
Jan
|
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(10) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(9) |
Jun
(4) |
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(2) |
Jun
|
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
2012 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(1) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(2) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Marius S. <li...@al...> - 2004-02-21 09:27:57
|
Hi, I'm currently the maintainer of the FreeBSD port of cdrdao (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/sysutils/cdrdao) and it would be great if its non-port-specific local patches (i.e. patches dealing with the install location, etc.) could be incorporated into the cdrdao repository. Attached is a diff against the current HEAD of the CVS repository. Most changes are FreeBSD- and LP64-related and I already sent them to Andreas Mueller once, others fix issues introduced with the gnome2 changes in cdrdao 1.1.8. Detailed list of changed files: configure.in: - Add an option --without-xdao which completely disables the compilation of gcdmaster (even the tests for the required libs). - When using an existing pccts (i.e. one specified via --with-pcctsbin and --with-pcctsinc) it's not necessary to compile the one shipping with cdrdao. This was broken when switching to automake/the gnome2 changes. - Improve the checks for --with-pcctsbin and --with-pcctsinc, if something is wrong just use the pccts shipping with cdrdao instead of bailing out. - Some FreeBSD-related improvements, e.g. add support for current and soon to be upcoming versions, use the Linux sound interface also on FreeBSD. README.FreeBSD: - Remove it as the infomation given here is outdated. The required kernel options are enabled in the GENERIC kernel since FreeBSD 4.0 (released March 2000) and their names have changed more than once over time. Therefore instead of writing a version that tries to list the correct options for the different kernel versions that would probably confuse people more than help them I decided to no longer let the port install this file. I never received a complaint regarding this in the time of being the maintainer, which is over a year. Makefile.am: - Second part of making pccts an optional target. - Remove README.FreeBSD. utils/Makefile.am: - Compile and install toc2cddb. Seems to have been broken by the switch to automake. specs/cdrdao.fedora1.spec.in and specs/cdrdao.rh9.spec.in: - Remove README.FreeBSD and add toc2cddb. I hope this is done right as I didn't test it. dao/cdrdao.drivers: - Add a few burners. dao/ScsiIf-lib.cc and trackdb/lec.cc: - LP64 fixes, tested on FreeBSD/alpha and FreeBSD/sparc64. These changes don't have an impact on the binaries generated on i386, i.e. they are identical to the ones without these changes. paranoia/isort.c: - Fix for !i386 platforms, taken from the cdparanoia repository: <snip> fixed up two allocations of the wrong type (sort_link * instead of sort_link and ** instead of *). All are 4 bytes on Intel/GCC so no damage done to released binaries, but this obviously had to be fixed. <snip> trackdb/Track.cc: - Cdrdao here uses a GCC extensions (IIRC, it's not defined in the C++ standard or at least it's unclear on it) without a need as the standard constructor of class Msf also sets lba etc. to 0. This fixes compilation with the Intel C++ Compiler. xdao/CdDevice.cc - Replace deprecated malloc.h header with stdlib.h. xdao/SoundIF-linux.cc - Add support for FreeBSD. |
From: Eric B. <eri...@ya...> - 2004-02-17 05:03:50
|
Denis Leroy wrote: >Folks, > >If you're using a CD-ROM or CD-R or DVD-R that's not in the >cdrdao.drivers file successfully and you feel confident about the >driver settings you're using, please update the 'cdrdao.drivers' file >with the correct entry, or send the entry to add to the mailing list. > >Thanks >-denis > > Can I make a suggestion? It looks like generic-mmc is the right driver setting for all of the recent CD-ROM drives I've used with cdrdao. Do you think it might be reasonable to make that the fallback case instead of failing altogether if a driver can't be found? |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-16 22:11:12
|
Folks, If you're using a CD-ROM or CD-R or DVD-R that's not in the cdrdao.drivers file successfully and you feel confident about the driver settings you're using, please update the 'cdrdao.drivers' file with the correct entry, or send the entry to add to the mailing list. Thanks -denis __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Marius S. <li...@al...> - 2004-02-16 01:04:42
|
On Sun, Feb 15, 2004 at 04:28:05PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: >=20 > --- Marius Strobl <li...@al...> wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 05:08:48PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > > >=20 > > > Yup, the Makefile.am files have a few missing things which causes > > 'make > > > dist' to miss some stuff. I'll update them. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Thanks. Did you/will you release a new tarball? >=20 > Yes, the released files have been updated. Let me know if you see any > other problems. >=20 Ok, seems like the SourceForge mirrors still need to catch up on the re-rolled cdrdao-1.1.8.tar.gz. I have a problem here with gcdmaster 1.1.8 on FreeBSD 5.2 (GCC 3.3.3). Whenever I try to burn an audio CD I get: Starting: /usr/local/bin/cdrdao simulate --remote 18 -v0 --device 1,5,0 -= -driver generic-mmc:0x0 --buffers 10 /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n=20 ERROR: /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n:1: Illegal token: =D0 ERROR: /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n:1: Illegal token: =D0 ERROR: /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n:1: Illegal token: =D0 ERROR: /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n:1: Illegal token: =D0 ERROR: /tmp/gcdm.toc.kXV70n:1: syntax error at "EOF" missing { TrackDef = CdText } The problem seems to be that in Toc::write(int fd) you rely on a pointer to a temporary object for char* content. Attached is a patch that fixes this for me. |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-16 00:31:29
|
--- Marius Strobl <li...@al...> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 05:08:48PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > > > > Yup, the Makefile.am files have a few missing things which causes > 'make > > dist' to miss some stuff. I'll update them. > > > > Thanks. Did you/will you release a new tarball? Yes, the released files have been updated. Let me know if you see any other problems. Thanks -denis __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Marius S. <li...@al...> - 2004-02-15 13:57:06
|
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 05:08:48PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > > Yup, the Makefile.am files have a few missing things which causes 'make > dist' to miss some stuff. I'll update them. > Thanks. Did you/will you release a new tarball? |
From: Matthias C. <der...@gm...> - 2004-02-15 03:01:43
|
Hi! Can cdrdao handle big-endian data files? The reason I ask is because the CUE format has an option to indicate that a given data file is big-endian (MOTOROLA) and Im trying to do a converter from CUE to TOC. I guess I should just reject such a CUE file? Regards Matthias |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-15 01:11:35
|
Yup, the Makefile.am files have a few missing things which causes 'make dist' to miss some stuff. I'll update them. --- Marius Strobl <li...@al...> wrote: > > I'm a bit puzzled why the following files are tagged with rel_1_1_8 > in the repository but aren't in cdrdao-1.1.8.tar.gz: > > Release-1.1.0 > Release-1.1.2 > Release-1.1.3 > Release-1.1.4 > Release-1.1.5 > Release-1.1.6 > Release-1.1.8 > aspi.reg > autogen.sh > cdrdao.lsm > contrib/* > dao/cdrdao.drivers > paranoia/overlapdef.txt > testtocs/* > utils/toc2cddb.cc > xdao/BUGS > xdao/TASKS > xdao/cdrdao.txt > xdao/gcdmaster.desktop > xdao/gcdmaster.png > xdao/glade/* > > Not all of these are vital in a release, but I'm somewhat misssing > Release-1.1.8 and cdrdao.drivers, aspi.reg and xdao/gcdmaster.desktop > also might be usefull for some. > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Marius S. <li...@al...> - 2004-02-14 23:49:03
|
I'm a bit puzzled why the following files are tagged with rel_1_1_8 in the repository but aren't in cdrdao-1.1.8.tar.gz: Release-1.1.0 Release-1.1.2 Release-1.1.3 Release-1.1.4 Release-1.1.5 Release-1.1.6 Release-1.1.8 aspi.reg autogen.sh cdrdao.lsm contrib/* dao/cdrdao.drivers paranoia/overlapdef.txt testtocs/* utils/toc2cddb.cc xdao/BUGS xdao/TASKS xdao/cdrdao.txt xdao/gcdmaster.desktop xdao/gcdmaster.png xdao/glade/* Not all of these are vital in a release, but I'm somewhat misssing Release-1.1.8 and cdrdao.drivers, aspi.reg and xdao/gcdmaster.desktop also might be usefull for some. |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-13 05:23:33
|
yeh! File'em bug reports! -denis __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Manuel C. <ll...@er...> - 2004-02-12 17:38:37
|
Denis Leroy wrote: > I just finished merging the gnome2 branch back into head. Just prior to > the merge, I tagged the top of the tree as 'Andreas_1_1_7'. > > Manuel, should I just go ahead and release 1.1.8 ? (current version is > marked as 1.1.8rc1 in configure.in). Update the Release-1.1.8 file (if you haven't already) and go for it. The gnome2 port of gcdmaster is going to rock :) Oh, perhaps you can name this release "seeking Andreas Mueller" :) -- Manuel Clos ll...@er... http://llanero.eresmas.net |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-12 03:24:07
|
I just finished merging the gnome2 branch back into head. Just prior to the merge, I tagged the top of the tree as 'Andreas_1_1_7'. Manuel, should I just go ahead and release 1.1.8 ? (current version is marked as 1.1.8rc1 in configure.in). __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Matthias C. <der...@gm...> - 2004-02-12 00:03:45
|
On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:45:57AM +0100, Giuseppe Corbelli wrote: > > > Would you be interested in working on a similar set of utilities to > > > import 'inf' files as generated by cdrecord and cdda2wav ? > > > > In principle yes. But I cannot promise that I will come up with something > > useful or that it will happen in a reasonable amount of time ;) > > I just looked at cdda2wav and it seems it always creates an .inf file for > > each track. I have never seen or used it. Whats the typical usage? > With cdrecord -useinf > With inf files you can build CDTEXT items and set pregap. Mmh ok, Ill look at it. Regards Matthias |
From: Giuseppe C. <co...@lu...> - 2004-02-11 20:43:51
|
On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 10:29:10PM +0100, Matthias Czapla wrote: ... > > Would you be interested in working on a similar set of utilities to > > import 'inf' files as generated by cdrecord and cdda2wav ? > > In principle yes. But I cannot promise that I will come up with something > useful or that it will happen in a reasonable amount of time ;) > I just looked at cdda2wav and it seems it always creates an .inf file for > each track. I have never seen or used it. Whats the typical usage? With cdrecord -useinf With inf files you can build CDTEXT items and set pregap. -- Giuseppe "Cowo" Corbelli ~\/~ My software: http://cowo.yoda2000.net DOS - Defective Operating System IBM - I Blame Microsoft BASIC - Bill's Attempt to Seize Industry Control WINDOWS - Will Install Needless Data On Whole System MICROSOFT - Most Intelligent Customers Realize Our Software Only Fools Teenagers |
From: Matthias C. <der...@gm...> - 2004-02-11 03:38:28
|
Hi! I have gotten some kind of reference for the CUE file format, namely the Cdrwin manual from www.goldenhawk.com. To my knowledge this was the first program to generate bin/cue files and the manual contains an appendix explaining the CUE format. I would like to map the CUE track modes: AUDIO Audio (2352) CDG Karaoke CD+G (2448) MODE1/2048 CD-ROM Mode1 (cooked) MODE1/2352 CD-ROM Mode1 (raw) MODE2/2336 CD-ROM XA Mode2 MODE2/2352 CD-ROM XA Mode2 CDI/2336 CD-I Mode2 CDI/2352 CD-I Mode2 to cdrdao's track modes: AUDIO (2352), MODE1 (2048), MODE1_RAW (2352), MODE2 (2336), MODE2_FORM1 (2048), MODE2_FORM2 (2324), MODE2_FORM_MIX (2336, including sub-header), MODE2_RAW (2352). CUEs AUDIO, MODE1/2048 and MODE1/2352 seem obvious but CDG seems not to be available in cdrdao. The MODE2s and CDIs in CUE have the same sectorsize but cdrdao has only one mode 2 with 2352 and the other two I dont know which is what... So basically I want to ask if somebody could fill out the following table please? CUE TOC ------------------------------ AUDIO AUDIO CDG ? MODE1/2048 MODE1 MODE1/2352 MODE1_RAW MODE2/2336 ? MODE2/2352 ? CDI/2336 ? CDI/2352 ? Oh, and while were at it - do I understand it right, that for a session type of CD_ROM there are _only_ MODE1 and AUDIO tracks allowed (not MODE1_RAW for example)? And does CD_ROM_XA mean _either_ MODE2_FORM1 and possibly AUDIO _or_ MODE2_FORM2 and possibly AUDIO (in contrast to a mix of all three)? Regards Matthias |
From: Manuel C. <ll...@er...> - 2004-02-10 14:28:45
|
Denis Leroy wrote: > Ok, i'll do what you requested. > > Another option we might want to consider is to spin off gcdmaster - and > gcdmaster only - into its own project. cdrdao would remain as it is > now, with an occasional patch request, and gcdmaster would either rely > on a pre-installed cdrdao or link straight with an included version of > libdao.a. The only advanatage i can think of this scenario would be to > give gcdmaster a little bit more exposure (?). gcdmaster depends on the trackdb library. Perhaps we can make gcdmaster a module (not another project), so we release it separated from cdrdao, but we can still maintain the current cvs structure. I think it is a good thing, but not a priority. -- Manuel Clos ll...@er... http://llanero.eresmas.net |
From: Matthias C. <der...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 21:29:22
|
Hi Denis! On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 12:29:25PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > Hi Matthias, > > It's looking good, though i haven't had a chance to actually test it. > Are there linux apps that generate CUE files or is it a Windows thing ? I dont know if there are Linux apps that generate CUEs and what programs produced the ones I have had, sorry. > Would you be ok if we add it to our set of utils as part of the cdrdao > project ? We could certainly use it from gcdmaster as an 'Import...' > menu item. Of course, no problem. > Would you be interested in working on a similar set of utilities to > import 'inf' files as generated by cdrecord and cdda2wav ? In principle yes. But I cannot promise that I will come up with something useful or that it will happen in a reasonable amount of time ;) I just looked at cdda2wav and it seems it always creates an .inf file for each track. I have never seen or used it. Whats the typical usage? Regards lal > -denis > > --- Matthias Czapla <der...@gm...> wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have written a small program to convert CUE files as they are used > > for > > audio CDs referencing a single large audio file to TOC format. It > > calculates > > the length parameter of the FILE statement from the difference > > between the > > INDEX statements of adjacent tracks in the CUE file and also creates > > proper > > CD-Text blocks. At least I hope it does ;) > > > > You can download it here: > > http://grmblpfz.ath.cx/~lal/cue2toc/cue2toc-0.1.tar.gz > > > > Feedback would be _very_ welcome, especially since this is my first > > project > > ever so its probably full of things that could be done better and I > > want to > > know about them! > > > > Regards > > lal |
From: Steve H. <st...@ho...> - 2004-02-09 21:01:48
|
Yes, I would agree with splitting it off into its own project. Leave CDRDAO as its own app. I for one don't currently do X and would not want to be required to have GTK and all that stuff installed just to compile newer versions of cdrdao. The zinf audio player is getting that way and is not a good thing. On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 11:55:57AM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > Ok, i'll do what you requested. > > Another option we might want to consider is to spin off gcdmaster - and > gcdmaster only - into its own project. cdrdao would remain as it is > now, with an occasional patch request, and gcdmaster would either rely > on a pre-installed cdrdao or link straight with an included version of > libdao.a. The only advanatage i can think of this scenario would be to > give gcdmaster a little bit more exposure (?). > > Just an idea, i don't have a strong opinion honestly. > -denis > > --- Manuel Clos <ll...@er...> wrote: > > Ok, meanwhile we try to know what happened to Andreas, I think we can > > go > > this way: > > > > 1) Tag the current HEAD as "1.1.7-Andreas" or something > > 2) Merge Denis work into HEAD (both gcdmaster and cdrdao patches) > > 3) Then, tag HEAD as 1.1.8 and release (we should be tagging releases > > in > > the past) > > 4) Continue devel on HEAD (big changes on branches, as always) > > > > Denis, can you take care of this all? > > > > I just would like that patches that apply outside the xdao dir are > > sent > > first to the list. Denis, can you resend to the list the patches you > > sent to Andreas about cdrdao, before you merge them? This way > > Giuseppe > > will be able to take a look. > > > > We need a to explain it all a bit in the release notes. > > > > See you. > > > > > > Giuseppe Corbelli wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:09:41PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > > > > > >>It would be nice if an executive decision were made regarding this > > >>issue, since i've spent a fair amount of work on the gnome2 branch > > and > > >>it'd be sad if it was all for naught. Manuel, can you take over the > > >>project completely ? Or can we release from the gnome2 branch ? Or > > spin > > >>off the project ? It will be difficult to make major changes to the > > >>libdao.a layer without having an in-house SCSI specialist (which > > i'm > > >>not), but certainly minor patches should be ok, and we can then > > >>concentrate on new featurse to trackdb and gcdmaster. > > >> > > >>Opinions ? > > > > > > I would suggest that Manuel starts to commit the changes. If he > > doesn't > > > development is stopped. I have some little knowledge in SCSI > > programming and > > > may be of some help. > > > > > > -- > > Manuel Clos > > ll...@er... > > http://llanero.eresmas.net > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > > _______________________________________________ > > Cdrdao-devel mailing list > > Cdr...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdrdao-devel > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. > http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Cdrdao-devel mailing list > Cdr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdrdao-devel > > -- HolmesGrown Solutions The best solutions for the best price! http://ld.net/?holmesgrown |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-09 20:29:31
|
Hi Matthias, It's looking good, though i haven't had a chance to actually test it. Are there linux apps that generate CUE files or is it a Windows thing ? Would you be ok if we add it to our set of utils as part of the cdrdao project ? We could certainly use it from gcdmaster as an 'Import...' menu item. Would you be interested in working on a similar set of utilities to import 'inf' files as generated by cdrecord and cdda2wav ? -denis --- Matthias Czapla <der...@gm...> wrote: > Hi! > > I have written a small program to convert CUE files as they are used > for > audio CDs referencing a single large audio file to TOC format. It > calculates > the length parameter of the FILE statement from the difference > between the > INDEX statements of adjacent tracks in the CUE file and also creates > proper > CD-Text blocks. At least I hope it does ;) > > You can download it here: > http://grmblpfz.ath.cx/~lal/cue2toc/cue2toc-0.1.tar.gz > > Feedback would be _very_ welcome, especially since this is my first > project > ever so its probably full of things that could be done better and I > want to > know about them! > > Regards > lal > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Cdrdao-devel mailing list > Cdr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdrdao-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-09 20:01:11
|
Here are the three patches i submitted to Andreas. Note: forwarded message attached. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-09 19:56:10
|
Ok, i'll do what you requested. Another option we might want to consider is to spin off gcdmaster - and gcdmaster only - into its own project. cdrdao would remain as it is now, with an occasional patch request, and gcdmaster would either rely on a pre-installed cdrdao or link straight with an included version of libdao.a. The only advanatage i can think of this scenario would be to give gcdmaster a little bit more exposure (?). Just an idea, i don't have a strong opinion honestly. -denis --- Manuel Clos <ll...@er...> wrote: > Ok, meanwhile we try to know what happened to Andreas, I think we can > go > this way: > > 1) Tag the current HEAD as "1.1.7-Andreas" or something > 2) Merge Denis work into HEAD (both gcdmaster and cdrdao patches) > 3) Then, tag HEAD as 1.1.8 and release (we should be tagging releases > in > the past) > 4) Continue devel on HEAD (big changes on branches, as always) > > Denis, can you take care of this all? > > I just would like that patches that apply outside the xdao dir are > sent > first to the list. Denis, can you resend to the list the patches you > sent to Andreas about cdrdao, before you merge them? This way > Giuseppe > will be able to take a look. > > We need a to explain it all a bit in the release notes. > > See you. > > > Giuseppe Corbelli wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:09:41PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > > > >>It would be nice if an executive decision were made regarding this > >>issue, since i've spent a fair amount of work on the gnome2 branch > and > >>it'd be sad if it was all for naught. Manuel, can you take over the > >>project completely ? Or can we release from the gnome2 branch ? Or > spin > >>off the project ? It will be difficult to make major changes to the > >>libdao.a layer without having an in-house SCSI specialist (which > i'm > >>not), but certainly minor patches should be ok, and we can then > >>concentrate on new featurse to trackdb and gcdmaster. > >> > >>Opinions ? > > > > I would suggest that Manuel starts to commit the changes. If he > doesn't > > development is stopped. I have some little knowledge in SCSI > programming and > > may be of some help. > > > -- > Manuel Clos > ll...@er... > http://llanero.eresmas.net > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Cdrdao-devel mailing list > Cdr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cdrdao-devel __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |
From: Matthias C. <der...@gm...> - 2004-02-09 03:50:02
|
Hi! I have written a small program to convert CUE files as they are used for audio CDs referencing a single large audio file to TOC format. It calculates the length parameter of the FILE statement from the difference between the INDEX statements of adjacent tracks in the CUE file and also creates proper CD-Text blocks. At least I hope it does ;) You can download it here: http://grmblpfz.ath.cx/~lal/cue2toc/cue2toc-0.1.tar.gz Feedback would be _very_ welcome, especially since this is my first project ever so its probably full of things that could be done better and I want to know about them! Regards lal |
From: Manuel C. <ll...@er...> - 2004-02-07 17:05:53
|
Ok, meanwhile we try to know what happened to Andreas, I think we can go this way: 1) Tag the current HEAD as "1.1.7-Andreas" or something 2) Merge Denis work into HEAD (both gcdmaster and cdrdao patches) 3) Then, tag HEAD as 1.1.8 and release (we should be tagging releases in the past) 4) Continue devel on HEAD (big changes on branches, as always) Denis, can you take care of this all? I just would like that patches that apply outside the xdao dir are sent first to the list. Denis, can you resend to the list the patches you sent to Andreas about cdrdao, before you merge them? This way Giuseppe will be able to take a look. We need a to explain it all a bit in the release notes. See you. Giuseppe Corbelli wrote: > On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:09:41PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > >>It would be nice if an executive decision were made regarding this >>issue, since i've spent a fair amount of work on the gnome2 branch and >>it'd be sad if it was all for naught. Manuel, can you take over the >>project completely ? Or can we release from the gnome2 branch ? Or spin >>off the project ? It will be difficult to make major changes to the >>libdao.a layer without having an in-house SCSI specialist (which i'm >>not), but certainly minor patches should be ok, and we can then >>concentrate on new featurse to trackdb and gcdmaster. >> >>Opinions ? > > I would suggest that Manuel starts to commit the changes. If he doesn't > development is stopped. I have some little knowledge in SCSI programming and > may be of some help. -- Manuel Clos ll...@er... http://llanero.eresmas.net |
From: Giuseppe C. <co...@lu...> - 2004-02-07 07:58:45
|
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 12:09:41PM -0800, Denis Leroy wrote: > It would be nice if an executive decision were made regarding this > issue, since i've spent a fair amount of work on the gnome2 branch and > it'd be sad if it was all for naught. Manuel, can you take over the > project completely ? Or can we release from the gnome2 branch ? Or spin > off the project ? It will be difficult to make major changes to the > libdao.a layer without having an in-house SCSI specialist (which i'm > not), but certainly minor patches should be ok, and we can then > concentrate on new featurse to trackdb and gcdmaster. > > Opinions ? I would suggest that Manuel starts to commit the changes. If he doesn't development is stopped. I have some little knowledge in SCSI programming and may be of some help. -- Giuseppe "Cowo" Corbelli ~\/~ My software: http://cowo.yoda2000.net -<! Failure is not an option...it's bundled with Microsoft !>- |
From: Denis L. <den...@ya...> - 2004-02-05 20:09:48
|
It would be nice if an executive decision were made regarding this issue, since i've spent a fair amount of work on the gnome2 branch and it'd be sad if it was all for naught. Manuel, can you take over the project completely ? Or can we release from the gnome2 branch ? Or spin off the project ? It will be difficult to make major changes to the libdao.a layer without having an in-house SCSI specialist (which i'm not), but certainly minor patches should be ok, and we can then concentrate on new featurse to trackdb and gcdmaster. Opinions ? -denis --- Giuseppe Corbelli <co...@lu...> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 10:09:21PM +0100, Manuel Clos wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > is anyone able to get in touch with Andreas Mueller? we have tried > to > > reach him by email with no luck. > It has been a long while since I heard him last time. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online. http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html |