Re: [Cdk-devel] CFV #14 and #16 accepted with 1 vote each

[E.L. W. <eg...@sc...>]

On Friday 27 June 2003 10:11, Christoph Steinbeck wrote:
> E.L. Willighagen (Egon) wrote:
> > I know that every year less people find the time to vote, but for CFV #14
> > and #16 this has been a project low! Both RFCs are accepted with zero
> > votes against it, and only 1 vote in favor.
> >
> > RFC #14: accepted, 1 vote in favor, 0 against
> > RFC #16: accepted, 1 vote in favor, 0 against
>
> I still have this in my mailbox and I acutally still want to vote.

Mmmm.... taking it formally, that is not possible...
but we must resolve the issue...

For now, would you have voted in favor or against? 
If there are many people who would have liked to vote against,
then we need to replace these RFC's with new ones....

> I think these decisions are very important and there should be more time
> for voting. 

In principle the RFC should have been extensively discussed, so most people
should in principle agree in the proposal before it even gets to a CFV...

> Especially people like me, who travel a lot and suffer from
> complete internet loss for severals days should be granted a little more
> time.

Ok, we need to replace RFC #1 then... with a similar RFC stating a voting
period of at least 2 weeks... would that be enough?

(This would then leed to the first obsoleted RFC :)

Egon