Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_133566CC9E7542F29927635DE54963A5oistjp_" --_000_133566CC9E7542F29927635DE54963A5oistjp_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have attached a patch fixing this bug: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?f= unc=3Ddetail&aid=3D3432131 It changes the MolecularFormulaManipulator.getHTML() method to return the e= lements in the Hill System order, same as the getString() method. I am not familiar with git and this is the first time I used it to generate= a patch, so please let me know if it works. By the way, I noticed the MolecularFormulaManipulator.getString() and Molec= ularFormulaManipulator.getHillString() do exactly the same thing, although = in different ways. Wouldn't it make sense to deprecate one of these methods= ? Best regards, Tomas --_000_133566CC9E7542F29927635DE54963A5oistjp_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi,

I have attached a patch fixing this bug: https://sourceforge.ne= t/tracker/?func=3Ddetail&aid=3D3432131

It changes the MolecularFormulaManipulator.getHTML() method to return = the elements in the Hill System order, same as the getString() method.

I am not familiar with git and this is the first time I used it to gen= erate a patch, so please let me know if it works.

By the way, I noticed the MolecularFormulaManipulator.getString()= and MolecularFormulaManipulator.getHillString() do exactly the same t= hing, although in different ways. Wouldn't it make sense to deprecate = one of these methods?

Best regards,

Tomas

--_000_133566CC9E7542F29927635DE54963A5oistjp_--