From: Karol L. <kar...@gm...> - 2017-08-14 02:59:26
|
It actually bothers me quite a bit, but I haven't had the energy to follow up on everything. To be fair, some of the long standing PRs have resulted in merging code in. But I agree, we should review all open PRs and and decide what to do. If there are PRs we'd like to hold off for some reason, we can mark them with a 1.6 or 2.x milestone. On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 1:34 PM, Eric Berquist <er...@pi...> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I noticed a week ago that when Jan Jensen tweeted out a link to cclib's > GitHub page, someone responded: > > yikes! PRs over a year old! >> > > https://twitter.com/ifndef_define/status/894490849521930240 > > While this doesn't bother me too much, I think that we should make a > decision about all outstanding PRs for both main repositories before 1.5.2 > is released. Does everyone else agree? > > Eric > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > |