Re: [cclib-devel] branch maintenance

[Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...>]

>From what I can see, the ORCA parser was alraedy merged into trunk.

If there is nothing new there (I've looked only at the parser source), then I think
the branch should be deleted, or marked somehow as inactive.

As far as I can see, the other parse branches (Molcas, NWChem, Turbomole) have
not been merged into trunk yet.

Karol

On Apr 19 2012, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> With the recent talk about updating the license of cclib, it got me
> thinking that we might need to perform some maintenance on the
> branches since several are quite old (e.g. Orca). Is it best to make
> sure the new parsers in those branches are well-supported, and then
> merge those changes into trunk? Or should we merge trunk into those
> branches?
> 
> Adam
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
> Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
> Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
> _______________________________________________
> cclib-devel mailing list
> ccl...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Thu Apr 19 18:39:04 CEST 2012