From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 16:11:10
|
Hmmm...I guess you're right - we should just leave it. It's clear from the source that a later version can be used instead. - Noel On 19 April 2012 17:07, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > With? Version 3 of the LGPL? > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. > > > > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > wrote: > > > > > Done. Please review. > > > > > > On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > > > > Both, I guess. > > > > > > > > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should > change > > > > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in > the > > > > > LICENSE file? > > > > > > > > > > - Karol > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > > > > > > Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle < > > > bao...@gm...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner < > > > kar...@gm...> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > >> Noel, > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from > > > Michael > > > > > Bank. Is there > > > > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or > > > later"? > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> - Karol > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck < > mb...@de...> > > > > > ----- > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream > authors > > > to > > > > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run > into > > > > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least > Noel > > > > > should > > > > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ... > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> -- > > > > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner > > > > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in > hours > > > and > > > > > minutes > > > > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester > Wave > > > > > Report as > > > > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service > > > > > providers. > > > > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of > services > > > and > > > > > vision. > > > > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list > > > > > > > > ccl...@li... > > > > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > written by Karol Langner > > > > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > written by Karol Langner > > > Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > > > > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Thu Apr 19 18:06:53 CEST 2012 > |