From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2012-04-19 16:07:02
|
Thanks for taking care of this. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > Looks good. We should probably replace LICENSE.txt too. > > > On 19 April 2012 15:17, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Done. Please review. >> >> On Apr 19 2012, Noel O'Boyle wrote: >> > Both, I guess. >> > >> > On 19 April 2012 12:30, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Hi, >> > > >> > > Let's get this done. I'll do it, but I'm not sure where I should >> > > change >> > > it. Should I update the license in every source file, or just in the >> > > LICENSE file? >> > > >> > > - Karol >> > > >> > > On Apr 13 2011, Karol M. Langner wrote: >> > > > Aye. >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 03:57:00PM -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: >> > > > > Aye. >> > > > > >> > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle >> > > > > <bao...@gm...> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > > All in favour say "aye". Aye. >> > > > > > >> > > > > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner >> > > > > > <kar...@gm...> >> > > wrote: >> > > > > >> Noel, >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from >> > > > > >> Michael >> > > Bank. Is there >> > > > > >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or >> > > > > >> later"? >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> - Karol >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> >> > > ----- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ... >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors >> > > > > >> to >> > > > > >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run >> > > > > >> into >> > > > > >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel >> > > should >> > > > > >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ... >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> -- >> > > > > >> written by Karol M. Langner >> > > > > >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 >> > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> > > > > > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours >> > > > > > and >> > > minutes >> > > > > > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave >> > > Report as >> > > > > > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service >> > > providers. >> > > > > > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services >> > > > > > and >> > > vision. >> > > > > > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo >> > > > > > _______________________________________________ >> > > > > > cclib-devel mailing list >> > > > > > ccl...@li... >> > > > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > written by Karol Langner >> > > > Wed Apr 13 11:52:52 CEST 2011 >> > > >> > > -- >> > > written by Karol Langner >> > > Thu Apr 19 13:24:30 CEST 2012 >> > > >> >> -- >> written by Karol Langner >> Thu Apr 19 16:16:58 CEST 2012 > > |