Menu
▾
▴
Re: [cclib-devel] [mbanck@debian.org: Re: [Debichem-devel] cclib]
|
From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2011-04-12 22:57:07
|
Aye. On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 2:26 AM, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > All in favour say "aye". Aye. > > On 12 April 2011 10:03, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: >> Noel, >> >> While working on packaging cclib I got this comment from Michael Bank. Is there >> any reason not to change the license to the current one "or later"? >> >> - Karol >> >> ----- Forwarded message from Michael Banck <mb...@de...> ----- >> >> ... >> >> ** As an aside, you might want to contact the upstream authors to >> relicense to "LGPL v2.1 or later", or else they might run into >> license incompatibilites further down the road (at least Noel should >> be aware of that, as OpenBabel keeps suffering from that) >> >> ... >> >> ----- End forwarded message ----- >> >> -- >> written by Karol M. Langner >> Tue Apr 12 11:00:31 CEST 2011 >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forrester Wave Report - Recovery time is now measured in hours and minutes > not days. Key insights are discussed in the 2010 Forrester Wave Report as > part of an in-depth evaluation of disaster recovery service providers. > Forrester found the best-in-class provider in terms of services and vision. > Read this report now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/ibm-webcastpromo > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > |
