From: Adam T. <ate...@gm...> - 2011-03-31 18:00:01
|
Hi Xaver, Thanks for contacting us about the ORCA bug. I'm the one who started that parser (I think), and if I remember correctly, and based on the 2.6.x manual, STO-3G isn't defined; 3-21G is the next improvement. As far as the NWChem files, I would be interested in the test files. It's not a package I'm using at the moment, but I've thought about trying it out for the constrained (?) DFT methodology. I can't guarantee that there will be a rigorous parser in the near future, but I could probably hack together basic support once I can find a few hours to focus on that. Thanks again, Adam On Mar 28, 2011, at 7:46 AM, Xaver W. wrote: > Hi, > > I'm currently testing the open-source quantum chemistry application NWChem > (http://www.nwchem-sw.org). As I'm trying stuff anyway, I could prepare cclib > regression test files with it in case you want to eventually support NWChem. > Are you interested? > > Oh, and one more thing: In your wiki I read that test files should be > "b3lyp/sto-3g". It seems however that the current ORCA test files were made > with 3-21G (see e.g. > http://cclib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cclib/trunk/data/ORCA/basicORCA2.6/dvb_gopt.inp?revision=937&view=markup > ). Have I misunderstood something? > > Regards, > Xaver > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel |