From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2011-03-16 14:39:21
|
On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 02:33:34PM +0000, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > On 16 March 2011 13:45, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 16, 2011 at 12:11:34PM +0000, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > >> On 16 March 2011 09:37, Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> wrote: > >> > On 16 March 2011 09:36, Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...> wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 11:53:20AM +0000, Noel O'Boyle wrote: > >> >>> Hi Karol, > >> >>> > >> >>> I'm just updating the changelog for cclib-1.0.1 and I see that you > >> >>> added a new attribute atommasses in r296. Can you update the wiki with > >> >>> information on this? > >> >>> > >> >>> - Noel > >> >> > >> >> Sure. I can't seem to edit pages on the wiki. Does that have something to > >> >> do with the recent software change? > >> > > >> > Probably - have you logged into SourceForge first, and then tried? > >> > >> It's looks like I needed to give you permissions - you're now an > >> editor and admin. It seems that an account is only created when you > >> visit the wiki for the first time. Then one of the wiki admins can > >> give permissions to the account. > > > > Works now. I added atommasses to both 'parsed data' pages, as I understand it made > > it into 1.0.1. The coverage is quite low among the parsers... > > That's right. 1.0.1 is basically trunk. > > A quick question: should every Gaussian calculation have atommasses set? Generally, yes, if there are atoms then I think Gaussian will always print a section with IAtWgt and AtmWgt. Althought there could be a special kind of calculation that does not have explicit atoms, it would be beyond the current scope of cclib. - Karol |