From: Karol M. L. <km...@mm...> - 2010-06-23 19:59:05
|
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 21:01:29 Noel O'Boyle wrote: > On 19 June 2010 12:30, Karol M. Langner <km...@mm...> wrote: > > I've run into this before, but did not happen to run cclib on the file. I > > think this happens when Gaussian detects linear dependencies in the > > basis set, which can happend as the geometry changes. > > That's right. > > > So, how do we deal with this? The parser shouldn't break at lease, so do > > we loosen the assert here and just issue a warning? Some further parts of > > the parser assume that nmo does not change, so it might raise other > > problems when nmo changes. > > I just removed the assert statement in r909. I only added it to be > careful. In reality, it doesn't affect anything, as the value will be > correct for whatever is parsed after that. Maybe issue a warning to the logger? -- written by Karol Langner Wed Jun 23 21:56:06 CEST 2010 |