Re: [cclib-devel] Modifications to cclib 1.0

[Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...>]

On Friday 09 April 2010 19:39:11 Adam Tenderholt wrote:
> >>> Any thoughts on keeping them as vibmasses or should we call them
> >>> atomicmasses?
> >>
> >> It sounds like atommasses (like atomnos) would make most sense.
> >
> > OK, I can do this in the trunk later today. Adam, you'll have to sync the
> > branches you develop.
>
> Karol, do you just want to merge the changes I made for the Gaussian and
> ADF parsers (turbomol branch) into trunk before you start working on them?
> You'll have the rename them from vibmasses to atomicmasses.
>
> Adam

Oops! I forgot about that, went ahead and wrote the code for the Gaussian 
parser on my own. I will look at the TM branch to check if it differs. The 
ADF code should be merged, though. I will not be doing that today, however, 
so if you want to do it now, go ahead.

Sorry,
Karol

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Fri Apr  9 20:31:47 CEST 2010