Re: [cclib-devel] Modifications to cclib 1.0

[Adam T. <ate...@gm...>]

>>> 
>>> 
>>> Any thoughts on keeping them as vibmasses or should we call them
>>> atomicmasses?
>> 
>> It sounds like atommasses (like atomnos) would make most sense.
> 
> OK, I can do this in the trunk later today. Adam, you'll have to sync the 
> branches you develop.
> 

Karol, do you just want to merge the changes I made for the Gaussian and ADF parsers (turbomol branch) into trunk before you start working on them? You'll have the rename them from vibmasses to atomicmasses.

Adam