From: Karol M. L. <kar...@gm...> - 2009-08-21 22:24:07
|
Seems like everyone's writing theses these days :) Some time ago I added the capacity to parse multiple files to cclib, so that should not be a problem for turbomole. Chris - could you verify that the basic tests you contributed are OK? - Karol On Friday 21 August 2009 23:35:13 Christopher Rowley wrote: > I had contributed a rudimentary Turbomole parser a couple of years > ago. I use it on occasion and it works reasonably for geometries, > energies, and gradients. I never ran a complete set of tests, so I'm > not sure if it's working properly yet, especially in terms of MO > coefficients, but it's there if someone wanted to try it out. After > my thesis is submitted, I might have a little more time to finalize > and complete the parser. > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > From: Adam Tenderholt [mailto:a-t...@st...] > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 5:24 PM > To: kar...@gm... > Cc: ccl...@li... > Subject: Re: [cclib-devel] Spartan'08 and Turbomole support > > Jonas, > > I could also try to find a bit of time over the next few weeks, but > I can't promise anything. We will need some standard output files. > Look at the dvb* output files in the subdirectories at > http://cclib.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/cclib/trunk/data/ > to get a sense of our standard test files. Also, what information > are you interested in? > > I also noticed that there is a branch for Turbomole already in our > cclib project. I don't know how complete it is (or if it even > works!), but it might be worth checking out. Noel, if it's complete, > can it be dropped in a GaussSum installation to get Turbomole > support? > > Adam > > On Aug 21, 2009, at 11:36 AM, Karol M. Langner wrote: > > On Friday 21 August 2009 18:41:23 Jonas Baltrusaitis wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I've recently stumbled upon gaussum and cclib and am delighted > >> that I finally found somethingg that does what I want... (for > >> free...) > >> > >> I would humbly ask implement Spartan'08 and Turbomole support > >> into this package. I am more than happy to contribute output > >> files > >> > >> Jonas > > > > Jonas, > > > > I would be happy to work on Turbomole support (actually I recall > > there were plans to add it). However, adding support for a program > > is usually a bit of work and time, and I myself can't spare that > > much time for the next few weeks. I'm not sure about the others. > > > > The best thing to do would be to add a feature request on > > Sourceforge, which would maximize the chances we will get around > > to this in the near future. > > > > Cheers, > > Karol -- written by Karol Langner Sat Aug 22 00:16:07 CEST 2009 |