From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2009-07-20 17:46:35
|
2009/7/20 Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...>: > On Friday 12 June 2009 08:36:43 Manuel Melle Franco wrote: >> On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Karol Langner > <kar...@gm...>wrote: >> > Hi Manuel, >> > >> > As far as I know, ONIOM is not implemented in an other quantum chem >> > program >> > that we support at the moment. That being said, parsing ONIOM-specific >> > stuff >> > from only Gaussian would not be very useful in general, as we aim for >> > extracted the same data from many programs. Correct me if I'm wrong, >> > Noel. >> > >> > However, if ONIOM output is not parsed by cclib, then that is a bug and >> > we should be able to fix it. >> >> Dear Karol and Noel, >> >> As far as I know only gaussian and nwchem have it. >> I am quite new to it and currently doing the parsing myself (fgrep mostly) >> but it works only in the cases I use, >> and it is a bit of a pain in the ass to parse. >> >> I agree with Karol, I think it might not be easy to write a general parser >> for oniom so that it would not be worth the effort to add it to cclib, at >> list at this point, maybe when more program have it, if that ever happens. >> >> best regards >> >> Manuel > > Manuel, > > I fixed the gaussian parser so that it does not fail now when parsing ONIOM > calcs. Attached are two Gausian03 test files that I used for testing. Since > it is not a new feature, I'm not adding them as tests or regressions. Please do add the files - this is what the regression test suite is for. :-) > Please be aware that this does not mean that cclib now parses ONIOM output -- > it does not! It merely does not crash now. Perhaps some of the parsed data > can be of use, anyway. > If you have output that still crashes the parser (using today's revision), > please send it to us so we can make the parser more failure-proof. > > Cheers, > Karol > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Mon Jul 20 17:23:26 CEST 2009 > |