From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2007-08-09 15:08:57
|
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...> Date: 09-Aug-2007 16:08 Subject: Re: [cclib-devel] gaussian symmetry labels To: Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> On 07/08/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote: > > I take ?X to mean Gaussian don't have a clue. So it should set it to > > A, I guess. The other labels should be handled correctly by cclib, > > right? > > Gaussian can't figure out what the symmetry of that orbital is, but > it can for the majority of them. I don't see any reason to change the > behavior unless you really think we should. After all, A isn't a > symmetry in D3h anymore than ?A, ?B, etc. are. True. What do you suggest? A "?" for all unknown symmetries? Can you clarify - does this actually break the parser? > Adam > > > On 06/08/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote: > >> Hey Noel, > >> > >> Have you ever seen the symmetry labels ?A, ?B, ?C, and ?D ? It's on a > >> D3h structure I'm studying. Labels A1', A1", A2', A2", E', and E" > >> also show up. The weird labels also mainly show up in the "core" > >> levels, although there are a few in the virtual set. > >> > >> Adam > >> > >> > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > --- > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a > > browser. > > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > > _______________________________________________ > > cclib-devel mailing list > > ccl...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > > |