From: Karol L. <kar...@kn...> - 2007-08-08 08:50:42
|
On Thursday 12 July 2007 11:45, Karol Langner wrote: > At some point I'd like cclib to also parse the MO eigenvectors for > correlated methods - natural orbitals from MP2 or CI, and optimized > orbitals after MCSCF calcualtions. They all have the format of mocoeffs, > with different values. I'd like to have your opinion - should these be > parsed into the same attribute as the SCF MOs (mocoeffs) or into a new one > (mpcoeffs?)? I'm still not in my normal workspace, so It'll be a few days before I read through all the mail from the past few weeks, but I now did one thing I am very eager to see in cclib in the next release - parsing natural orbitals. I wrote about this some time ago (see the above), and some thinking made me confident to create a new attribute - nocoeffs. Natural orbitals are mathematically totally different numbers than MO coefficients, although their print-out usually looks very similar. I added code for them in Gaussian and GAMESS for CIS and MP2 - see my commit for details. Cheers, Karol -- written by Karol Langner Wed Aug 8 10:43:03 EDT 2007 |