From: Karol L. <kar...@kn...> - 2007-05-23 12:37:41
|
Hi all, Concerning the fragcharges attribute from the population methods - they currently contain the number of electrons on the fragment and not the charge on (for example) an atom. Shouldn't we add the nuclear charge for fragments on atoms? If not, maybe it would be better to rename the attribute to something like "fragpop"? - Karol -- written by Karol Langner Wed May 23 14:35:06 CEST 2007 |