From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2007-03-05 12:58:44
|
On 05/03/07, Maxim Fedorovsky <Max...@un...> wrote: > Noel O'Boyle schrieb: > > Works for me. Looks great, although I'm not sure what it's doing - I'd > > better read the manual. :-) > > > > We're starting to plan what we want to include in cclib 0.8. Can you > > describe exactly what information you currently extract from the log > > files? (Please 'cc' everything to cclib-dev list) > > > > P.S. I'm away soon until the 17th March, so don't worry if you don't > > hear from me. > > > > Regards, > > Noel > Hello ! > > To see what exactly is extracted refer to the docstrings of the > pyviblib.io.parsers module, > http://pyvib2.sourceforge.net/doc/pydoc/pyviblib.io.parsers.html. You refer to "Cartesian excursions". I wonder if this is the same as what I call "cartesian displacement vectors". > PyVib2 > uses properties (and so, new-style classes) rather than class attributes > to store the information. > The pyviblib.io.writers module might be also of interest for you. They are interesting, but it's not currently a goal of cclib to write output files, until a standard XML output file for comp chem has been developed (which I understand is currently in development by a number of interested parties). Anyway, my question is, if we extract the information that PyVib2 likes, would PyVib2 use cclib? Regards, Noel |