From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2007-02-19 08:09:43
|
Yes, I understand. I'll look into this... On 18/02/07, Karol Langner <kar...@kn...> wrote: > Hi, > > The reason I overloaded the test methods of GenericMPTest is to make the > docstrings different for MP2-5, which are printed out when runngin the tests. > Now they are back to being the same again, as so: > > **** Testing Gaussian **** > Are Moller-Plesset corrections negative? ... ok > Are the dimensions of mpenergies correct? ... ok > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ran 2 tests in 0.001s > > OK > > **** Testing Gaussian **** > Are Moller-Plesset corrections negative? ... ok > Are the dimensions of mpenergies correct? ... ok > > so you don't see which MPx is failing in case of error. > > Is there an alternate way to print out something unique for various instances > of GenericMPTest. > > Cheers, > Karol > > -- > written by Karol Langner > Sun Feb 18 15:44:35 CET 2007 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > |