From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2007-02-09 08:09:32
|
On 31/01/07, Karol Langner <kar...@kn...> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering about the basis sets output by Jaguar... they have me stumped, > since the contraction coefficients for the SP gaussian primitives are totally > different than those given by GAMESS and Gaussian. > > Compare the STO-3G function for carbon that I found in the cclib test > logfiles. > > Gaussian: > S 3 1.00 0.000000000000 > 0.7161683735D+02 0.1543289673D+00 > 0.1304509632D+02 0.5353281423D+00 > 0.3530512160D+01 0.4446345422D+00 > SP 3 1.00 0.000000000000 > 0.2941249355D+01 -0.9996722919D-01 0.1559162750D+00 > 0.6834830964D+00 0.3995128261D+00 0.6076837186D+00 > 0.2222899159D+00 0.7001154689D+00 0.3919573931D+00 STO-3G is defined as a set of 3 GTOs (1S), 3 GTOs (2S), and 3 GTOs(2P). > Jaguar: > s j > h c i n > e o s f > l n h s > atom l t l l h z coef rcoef > -------- --- --- -- -- --- ---------- ---------- --------- > C1 1 3 0 1 0 71.6168373 0.1543290 2.7078144 > C1 2 -1 0 1 0 13.0450963 0.5353281 2.6188802 > C1 3 -1 0 1 0 3.5305122 0.4446345 0.8161906 > C1 4 2 2 1 1 2.9412494 -0.2956454 -0.4732386 > C1 5 -4 2 1 1 0.6834831 1.1815287 0.6329949 > C1 6 2 -1 2 2 2.9412494 0.2213487 1.2152952 > C1 7 -6 -1 2 2 0.6834831 0.8627064 0.7642102 > C1 8 1 1 1 1 0.2222899 1.0000000 0.2307278 > C1 9 1 -1 2 2 0.2222899 1.0000000 0.2175654 > > The coefficient for the S shells are the same, but the ones for SP are not. > Does anybody know how to explain this, and eventually how to interconvert? I > assume that the STO-3G functions used in both programs are identical, so it > should be possible. Or, where should I ask about this? Maybe this is the > reason why there's no gbasis attribute for the Jaguar parser yet? STO-3G is defined differently as a set of 3 GTOs (1S), 2 GTOs + 1 GTO (2S), 2GTOs + 1 GTO (2P). Now that we've figured this out, I will add gbasis to the Jaguar parser over the next few days. Noel |