From: Noel O'B. <bao...@gm...> - 2007-01-30 09:32:23
|
Was this issue resolved in the end? On 23/01/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote: > I have added some more code for the CDA method. It now reproduces the > numbers (well, still off by a factor of two and am hopefully going to > hear back from Frenking about this soon) that the C++ version of CDA > gives. I have also created a wiki page on how to use it: http:// > cclib.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Charge_Decomposition_Analysis > > I haven't tested my implementation against a "real" molecule with an > appreciable number of basis functions, nor I have tested it against > unrestricted S > 0 systems or fragments. > > Adam > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT > Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your > opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash > http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV > _______________________________________________ > cclib-devel mailing list > ccl...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel > |