Re: [cclib-devel] Molpro

[Karol L. <kar...@kn...>]

On Monday 29 of January 2007 23:14, you wrote:
> Hi Karol,
>
> Noel and I decided it made sense to move Molpro (and any new parsers)
> to their own branch for development until they are stable and ready
> for inclusion in a release. We discussed it on a previous thread
> awhile back, but under a different name. Here is the relevant text
> from Noel:
>
> "...I was suggesting that development for new parsers should be done
> on a branch, e.g. the molpro parser branch. This would only have
> tests and data files for
> molpro, for instance, and wouldn't contain the bridges, methods, etc.
> modules, so that development would be more focused (and the only
> changes would be parser related). Since Jaguar is slated for
> inclusion in the next release, I think it'd be easier at this stage
> to leave it on the trunk and do the final development there."

OK - I'll dig into the archives when needed.

> Out of curiosity, what parser are you thinking of adding?
>
> Adam

I was thinking about Molcas. Maybe also mpqc when I have more time, for fun.

Karol

-- 
written by Karol Langner
Mon Jan 29 23:39:46 CET 2007