Re: [cclib-devel] Molpro

[Adam T. <a-t...@st...>]

Hi Karol,

Noel and I decided it made sense to move Molpro (and any new parsers)  
to their own branch for development until they are stable and ready  
for inclusion in a release. We discussed it on a previous thread  
awhile back, but under a different name. Here is the relevant text  
from Noel:

"...I was suggesting that development for new parsers should be done  
on a branch, e.g. the molpro parser branch. This would only have  
tests and data files for
molpro, for instance, and wouldn't contain the bridges, methods, etc.  
modules, so that development would be more focused (and the only  
changes would be parser related). Since Jaguar is slated for  
inclusion in the next release, I think it'd be easier at this stage  
to leave it on the trunk and do the final development there."

Out of curiosity, what parser are you thinking of adding?

Adam