From: Karol L. <kar...@kn...> - 2007-01-25 15:29:48
|
On Thursday 25 of January 2007 09:17, you wrote: > It's absolutely worthwhile. If there's one thing I've learnt through > working on GaussSum, is that you need example files. Otherwise, you > just *think* it works for MP2; now, we're certain, and we'll still be > certain in a year's time. And we need to have the same certainty for > each of the other programs. Also, in a future version of Gaussian, the > MP5 output could be different, but we still want it to work for users > of the current version. > > In other words, tests keep us sane in a world of multiple versions of > multiple packages. :-) Of course you're right. It actially turned out that the line with the MP2 energies is different when MP3/MP4/MP5 is done (covered by the code I added). Karol -- written by Karol Langner Thu Jan 25 16:27:20 CET 2007 |