From: Noel O'B. <no...@ca...> - 2006-05-30 16:26:00
|
On Mon, 2006-05-29 at 18:45 -0700, Adam Tenderholt wrote: > > I'm currently working on the ADF problem. I think the solution > > might be yet > > more keywords. > > > > You see, the problem is that we take the HOMO information from the > > section > > which lists the energies of the all of the irreducible representations > > together (and I cannot see any other decent option). > > Sorry for not getting back last week. I was/am a bit busy. > I just looked at this problem. What if we look for a line Symmetry:, > and if it's NOSYM, we set a flag to decide whether to get the homo > information from the Orbital Energies (per Irrep and Spin)? I can't > see why this wouldn't work, and it would keep us from requiring an > EPRINT option. If the flag is set, mosyms is, by definition, just A > so we can create an appropriate sized list. Hmmm...I see where you're coming from. I forgot that they would all be A, so there's no need for the whole list...but aren't the evalues printed there also? If so, we need the extra EPRINT info... > > On a different note, we were discussed how to test the results. You > > may > > want to compare your MPA results with the output from ADF, enabled > > by the > > keywords described at: > > http://www.scm.com/Doc/Doc2005.01/ADF/ADFUsersGuide/page164.html > > I'll look into this. I don't have the time this week to work on > cclib, but we decided to push back the 0.5 release anyways, right? > Hopefully we can get it out mid-next week. Don't worry about it - real life comes first :-) By the way, I just got an answer back on the ADF SCF stuff - I'll put it up on the wiki - it's more complicated than the manual says! Regards, Noel |