Ditto. I think we are in agreement on this. Any major development
should be done on a branch after this point.
Noel
2008/5/14 Karol M. Langner <kar...@gm...>:
> On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Adam Tenderholt wrote:
>> The regression script looks fine to me now. I wonder if it was
>> because I was using the trunk regression.py script while having
>> another branch/ tag of cclib installed.
>
> I have no problem with that regression file.
>
>> If everyone else is on board for getting a new release out at the
>> end of June, I'm up for it. Is this going to mainly be a bug-fix
>> release or are we adding significant new features? We should
>> probably move this discussion into a new thread.
>
> I would opt for a quick release in June that concentrates on bug
> fixes, and then follow up with the next major release, if we find the
> time and new stuff gets done.
>
> Karol
>
>> Adam
>>
>> On May 14, 2008, at 12:04 AM, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
>> > This is likely to be an error by me at some point. I'll look into
>> > it. BTW, I think it's time for us to get out a release. How about
>> > the end of June? (I've a lot of stuff happenining at the start of
>> > June, so anything sooner would be a bit optimistic)
>> >
>> > 2008/5/13 Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...>:
>> >> Anyone else having problems with the regression test script
>> >> dying prematurely?
>> >>
>> >> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> >> File "regression.py", line 238, in ?
>> >> main()
>> >> File "regression.py", line 218, in main
>> >> eval(fnname)(data) # Run the test
>> >> File "regression.py", line 33, in
>> >> testGAMESS_basicPCGAMESS_dvb_td_out
>> >> assert len(logfile.etoscs) == 5
>> >> AttributeError: 'ccData' object has no attribute 'etoscs'
>> >>
>> >> This is with revision 811 on trunk. I didn't want to change
>> >> anything about the script to fix it in case there is some
>> >> underlying problem with the PCGAMESS parser.
>> >>
>> >> Adam
>
> --
> written by Karol Langner
> Wed May 14 22:26:02 CEST 2008
>
|
