---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Noel O'Boyle <bao...@gm...>
Date: 09-Aug-2007 16:08
Subject: Re: [cclib-devel] gaussian symmetry labels
To: Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...>
On 07/08/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote:
> > I take ?X to mean Gaussian don't have a clue. So it should set it to
> > A, I guess. The other labels should be handled correctly by cclib,
> > right?
>
> Gaussian can't figure out what the symmetry of that orbital is, but
> it can for the majority of them. I don't see any reason to change the
> behavior unless you really think we should. After all, A isn't a
> symmetry in D3h anymore than ?A, ?B, etc. are.
True. What do you suggest? A "?" for all unknown symmetries?
Can you clarify - does this actually break the parser?
> Adam
>
> > On 06/08/07, Adam Tenderholt <a-t...@st...> wrote:
> >> Hey Noel,
> >>
> >> Have you ever seen the symmetry labels ?A, ?B, ?C, and ?D ? It's on a
> >> D3h structure I'm studying. Labels A1', A1", A2', A2", E', and E"
> >> also show up. The weird labels also mainly show up in the "core"
> >> levels, although there are a few in the virtual set.
> >>
> >> Adam
> >>
> >>
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > ---
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
> > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
> > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a
> > browser.
> > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
> > _______________________________________________
> > cclib-devel mailing list
> > ccl...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/cclib-devel
>
>
|
